537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747065)
41. Fate of cryopreserved donor embryos.
Knopman JM; Talebian S; Berkeley AS; Grifo JA; Noyes N; Licciardi F
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1689-92. PubMed ID: 20056205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.
Levi-Setti PE; Cirillo F; Smeraldi A; Morenghi E; Mulazzani GEG; Albani E
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Mar; 35(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 29168022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts.
Hodes-Wertz B; Noyes N; Mullin C; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Jul; 23(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 21550305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Abnormal implantation after fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles.
Wang ET; Kathiresan ASQ; Bresee C; Greene N; Alexander C; Pisarska MD
Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 28433367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.
Cobo A; Kuwayama M; Pérez S; Ruiz A; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1657-64. PubMed ID: 17889865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Does freeze-all policy affect IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders?
Roque M; Valle M; Sampaio M; Geber S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 52(4):530-534. PubMed ID: 29280508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Efficacy of oocyte vitrification combined with blastocyst stage transfer in an egg donation program.
García JI; Noriega-Portella L; Noriega-Hoces L
Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):782-90. PubMed ID: 21303777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.
Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Polycystic ovary syndrome patients as oocyte donors: the effect of ovarian stimulation protocol on the implantation rate of the recipient.
Ashkenazi J; Farhi J; Orvieto R; Homburg R; Dekel A; Feldberg D; Ben Rafael Z
Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):564-7. PubMed ID: 7641911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Closed vs. Open Oocyte Vitrification Methods Are Equally Effective for Blastocyst Embryo Transfers: Prospective Study from a Sibling Oocyte Donation Program.
Gullo G; Petousis S; Papatheodorou A; Panagiotidis Y; Margioula-Siarkou C; Prapas N; D'Anna R; Perino A; Cucinella G; Prapas Y
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 32182615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The evolution of oocyte donation in China.
Wang F; Sun Y; Kong H; Li J; Su Y; Guo Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 110(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 20423738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
Yu S; Long H; Chang HY; Liu Y; Gao H; Zhu J; Quan X; Lyu Q; Kuang Y; Ai A
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 29300975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A reassessment of comparative pregnancy and implantation rates following embryo transfer in recipients vs their infertile donors also trying to conceive in the background of performing salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx.
Katsoff B; Check JH; Fox F; Choe JK; Iacone K
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2006; 33(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 17089575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sisters of women with premature ovarian failure may not be ideal ovum donors.
Sung L; Bustillo M; Mukherjee T; Booth G; Karstaedt A; Copperman AB
Fertil Steril; 1997 May; 67(5):912-6. PubMed ID: 9130899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles.
Peña JE; Chang PL; Chan LK; Zeitoun K; Thornton MH; Sauer MV
Hum Reprod; 2002 Jan; 17(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 11756366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Impact of male partner characteristics and semen parameters on in vitro fertilization and obstetric outcomes in a frozen oocyte donor model.
Capelouto SM; Nagy ZP; Shapiro DB; Archer SR; Ellis DP; Smith AK; Spencer JB; Hipp HS
Fertil Steril; 2018 Oct; 110(5):859-869. PubMed ID: 30316432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome.
Borini A; Levi Setti PE; Anserini P; De Luca R; De Santis L; Porcu E; La Sala GB; Ferraretti A; Bartolotti T; Coticchio G; Scaravelli G
Fertil Steril; 2010 Oct; 94(5):1662-8. PubMed ID: 20047739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.
Healy MW; Yamasaki M; Patounakis G; Richter KS; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27986817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
