These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747145)

  • 1. From objective to subjective: pitch representation in the human auditory cortex.
    Winkler I; Tervaniemi M; Huotilainen M; Ilmoniemi R; Ahonen A; Salonen O; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Näätänen R
    Neuroreport; 1995 Nov; 6(17):2317-20. PubMed ID: 8747145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representation of harmonic frequencies in auditory memory: a mismatch negativity study.
    Zion-Golumbic E; Deouell LY; Whalen DH; Bentin S
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Sep; 44(5):671-9. PubMed ID: 17608799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings.
    Alho K; Winkler I; Escera C; Huotilainen M; Virtanen J; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Mar; 35(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 9529947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
    Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
    Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latency variation of auditory N1m responses to vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamasoba T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1945-9. PubMed ID: 18007192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features.
    Paavilainen P; Arajärvi P; Takegata R
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jan; 18(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 17301682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex responses to the transition from monophonic to pseudo-stereo sound.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Wollbrink A; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():18. PubMed ID: 16012692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques.
    Micheyl C; Tian B; Carlyon RP; Rauschecker JP
    Neuron; 2005 Oct; 48(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 16202714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change detection in newborns using a multiple deviant paradigm: a study using magnetoencephalography.
    Sambeth A; Pakarinen S; Ruohio K; Fellman V; van Zuijen TL; Huotilainen M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 19211303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Draganova R; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2290-7. PubMed ID: 19136454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Palva S; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2000 Dec; 12(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 11112397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with event-related brain potentials and magnetic fields.
    Degerman A; Rinne T; Särkkä AK; Salmi J; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(12):3329-41. PubMed ID: 18598270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Newborns discriminate novel from harmonic sounds: a study using magnetoencephalography.
    Sambeth A; Huotilainen M; Kushnerenko E; Fellman V; Pihko E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 16426892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15351440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians.
    Tervaniemi M; Rytkönen M; Schröger E; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Learn Mem; 2001; 8(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 11584077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming.
    Rahne T; Deike S; Selezneva E; Brosch M; König R; Scheich H; Böckmann M; Brechmann A
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():118-31. PubMed ID: 17765207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure.
    Fujioka T; Trainor LJ; Ross B; Kakigi R; Pantev C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1010-21. PubMed ID: 15298788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.