These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747808)

  • 1. Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgments.
    Palmer CV; Killion MC; Wilber LA; Ballad WJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):587-98. PubMed ID: 8747808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound quality evaluation of anti-saturation circuitry in a hearing aid.
    Agnew J
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 9080551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
    Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of hearing aid processed music.
    Franks JR
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7060840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety limit warning levels for the avoidance of excessive sound amplification to protect against further hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28687060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response.
    Lundberg G; Ovegård A; Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A; Brändström U
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1641577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some characteristics of amplified music through hearing aids.
    Chasin M; Hockley NS
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():2-12. PubMed ID: 23880110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    McDaniel DM; Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 1608261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music and hearing aids.
    Madsen SM; Moore BC
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25361601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peaks in the frequency response of hearing aids: evaluation of the effects on speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 8729914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 1531242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB.
    Cox RM; Rivera IM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):242-54. PubMed ID: 1421456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality judgments of hearing aid transduced speech.
    Witter HL; Goldstein DP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 5558085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of high-fidelity hearing aids.
    Killion MC; Tillman TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 7087418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.