BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8747819)

  • 1. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values.
    Scherer RC; Vail VJ; Guo CG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 38(6):1260-9. PubMed ID: 8747819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perturbation Measurements on the Degree of Naturalness of Synthesized Vowels.
    Yamasaki R; Montagnoli A; Murano EZ; Gebrim E; Hachiya A; Lopes da Silva JV; Behlau M; Tsuji D
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):389.e1-389.e8. PubMed ID: 27777057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyses of Sustained Vowels in Down Syndrome (DS): A Case Study Using Spectrograms and Perturbation Data to Investigate Voice Quality in Four Adults With DS.
    Jeffery T; Cunningham S; Whiteside SP
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):644.e11-644.e24. PubMed ID: 28943107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative spectral evaluation of shimmer and jitter.
    Klingholz F; Martin F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 4010246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; López P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 12697983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective acoustic analysis of pathological voices from patients with vocal nodules and polyps.
    Jiang JJ; Zhang Y; MacCallum J; Sprecher A; Zhou L
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(6):342-9. PubMed ID: 19864916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Heuer RJ; Michael DD; Ostrowski R; Horman M; Baroody MM; Hillenbrand J; Sataloff RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2003 Apr; 112(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 12731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes After Voice Therapy in Acoustic Voice Analysis of Chinese Patients With Voice Disorders.
    Lu D; Chen F; Yang H; Yu R; Zhou Q; Zhang X; Ren J; Zheng Y; Zhang X; Zou J; Wang H; Liu J
    J Voice; 2018 May; 32(3):386.e1-386.e9. PubMed ID: 28606663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement.
    Bielamowicz S; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Dauer MS; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Feb; 39(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 8820704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Acoustic voice analysis in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy].
    Rosique M; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10217687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2201-11. PubMed ID: 15898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of aging on acoustic parameters of voice.
    Dehqan A; Scherer RC; Dashti G; Ansari-Moghaddam A; Fanaie S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(6):265-70. PubMed ID: 23328404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability.
    Gelfer MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 38(6):1189-98. PubMed ID: 8747813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers.
    Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Leppänen K; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 2008 May; 22(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 17134877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.