These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8748477)

  • 1. MR measurement of time-dependent blood pressure variations.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 8748477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A velocity correlation method for measuring vascular compliance using MR imaging.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 8748478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of pressure gradients in pulsatile flow from magnetic resonance acceleration measurements.
    Tasu JP; Mousseaux E; Delouche A; Oddou C; Jolivet O; Bittoun J
    Magn Reson Med; 2000 Jul; 44(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10893523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR measurements of pulsatile pressure gradients.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(6):829-36. PubMed ID: 7865944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of volume flow measurements with cine phase-contrast MR imaging for peripheral arterial waveforms.
    McCauley TR; Peña CS; Holland CK; Price TB; Gore JC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):663-8. PubMed ID: 8748483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tyszka JM; Laidlaw DH; Asa JW; Silverman JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 10931596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients.
    Mustert BR; Williams DM; Prince MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 9621971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of phantom and computer-simulated MR images of flow in a convergent geometry: implications for improved two-dimensional MR angiography.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 8748485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary flow quantification by Fourier velocity encoded MRI.
    Baltes Ch; Kozerke S; Boesiger P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1():412-5. PubMed ID: 12451879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data.
    Oyre S; Ringgaard S; Kozerke S; Paaske WP; Erlandsen M; Boesiger P; Pedersen EM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 32(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 9669260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Mukundan S; Loth F; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 8748480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrafast flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.
    Zhang H; Halliburton SS; Moore JR; Simonetti OP; Schvartzman PR; White RD; Chatzimavroudis GP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Jan; 30(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 11874135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI.
    Rich A; Potter LC; Jin N; Ash J; Simonetti OP; Ahmad R
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):689-701. PubMed ID: 26444911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of regional aortic compliance by MR imaging: a study of reproducibility.
    Forbat SM; Mohiaddin RH; Yang GZ; Firmin DN; Underwood SR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 8748479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 4D model of hemodynamics in the abdominal aorta.
    Zbicinski I; Veshkina N; Stefańczyk L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S257-64. PubMed ID: 26406010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of arterial pulse-wave velocity measurement using MR.
    Bolster BD; Atalar E; Hardy CJ; McVeigh ER
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 9702890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal artery velocity mapping with MR imaging.
    Maier SE; Scheidegger MB; Liu K; Schneider E; Bollinger A; Boesiger P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 8748484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation.
    Bakker CJ; Kouwenhoven M; Hartkamp MJ; Hoogeveen RM; Mali WP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 13(7):959-65. PubMed ID: 8583874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetization transfer on in vitro circulating blood: implications for time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Dousset V; Degrèze P; Mièze S; Sesay M; Basse-Cathalinat B; Caillé JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):786-8. PubMed ID: 8748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.