These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8748505)
21. Pulsed magnetization transfer imaging: evaluation of technique. Graham SJ; Henkelman RM Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):903-10. PubMed ID: 10478264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Wedge-shaped slice-selective adiabatic inversion pulse for controlling temporal width of bolus in pulsed arterial spin labeling. Guo J; Buxton RB; Wong EC Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26451521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A flow quantification method using fluid dynamics regularization and MR tagging. Jiraraksopakun Y; McDougall MP; Wright SM; Ji JX IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1437-45. PubMed ID: 20172815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Recent advances in magnetic resonance angiography of the brain. Bradley WG Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg; 1992 Dec; 5(6):859-62. PubMed ID: 1467579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of intravoxel velocity distributions on the accuracy of the phase-mapping method in phase-contrast MR angiography. Hamilton CA; Moran PR; Santago P; Rajala SA J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 7981522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Blood velocity assessment using 3D bright-blood time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography. Miraux S; Franconi JM; Thiaudière E Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 16902973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Fundamental study of the relation between flow velocity and signal intensity in the TrueFISP sequence]. Uchikoshi M; Ueda T; Nishiki S; Satou K; Wada A; Imaoka I; Matsuo M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Dec; 59(12):1529-34. PubMed ID: 15001867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Mukundan S; Loth F; Pettigrew RI J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 8748480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Mustert BR; Williams DM; Prince MR Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 9621971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]