These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8749587)

  • 1. Attentional flexibility and aging: you don't need to be 20 years of age to split the beam.
    Hahn S; Kramer AF
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Dec; 10(4):597-609. PubMed ID: 8749587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
    Mayer AR; Kosson DS
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.
    Deubel H
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):630-40. PubMed ID: 18839208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].
    Eusop E; Sebban C; Piette F
    Encephale; 2001; 27(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11294037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Focal visual attention and pattern discrimination.
    Saarinen J
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 8414877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of perceptual distinctiveness on the prospective and retrospective components of prospective memory in young and old adults.
    Cohen AL; Dixon RA; Lindsay DS; Masson ME
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):274-89. PubMed ID: 14710865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are age differences in consistent-mapping visual search due to feature learning or attention training?
    Rogers WA; Fisk AD
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Dec; 6(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 1777142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.
    Whiting WL; Madden DJ; Babcock KJ
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 17563178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.
    Paquet L; Lortie C
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 2243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age differences in visual search: target and distractor learning.
    Rogers WA
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Dec; 7(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 1466821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.
    Remington RW; Johnston JC; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 1561053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult age differences in the inhibition of return of visual attention.
    Hartley AA; Kieley JM
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Dec; 10(4):670-83. PubMed ID: 8749594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.
    Briand KA; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts.
    Hartley AA; Kieley JM; Slabach EH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):523-37. PubMed ID: 2144568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aging and interference: evidence from indirect memory tests.
    Hartman M
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Dec; 10(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 8749593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.