These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8749770)

  • 1. Effect of porous coating and loading conditions on total hip femoral stem stability.
    Biegler FB; Reuben JD; Harrigan TP; Hou FJ; Akin JE
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Dec; 10(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 8749770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
    Callaghan JJ; Fulghum CS; Glisson RR; Stranne SK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method.
    Andreaus U; Colloca M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of porous coating, with and without collar support, on early relative motion for a cementless hip prosthesis.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Biomech; 1993 Dec; 26(12):1355-68. PubMed ID: 8308041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis.
    Tai CL; Shih CH; Chen WP; Lee SS; Liu YL; Hsieh PH; Chen WJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):S53-8. PubMed ID: 12828915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of prosthesis shaft coating on postoperative load bearing of the femur].
    Baroud G; Willmann G; Kreissig R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43(1-2):25-8. PubMed ID: 9542285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis.
    Keaveny TM; Bartel DL
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1205-16. PubMed ID: 8253825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study.
    Russell RD; Huo MH; Rodrigues DC; Kosmopoulos V
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 27434281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
    Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Bachus KN; Bloebaum RD; Jones RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):248-57. PubMed ID: 10627742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A nonlinear finite element analysis of interface conditions in porous coated hip endoprostheses.
    Rohlmann A; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC; Bergmann G
    J Biomech; 1988; 21(7):605-11. PubMed ID: 3410864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):1047-58. PubMed ID: 1761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H
    Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fully automated generation of hip prosthesis voxel models of the femur for finite element analysis. Comparison of direct and subsequent prosthesis implantation].
    Schmitt J; Lengsfeld M; Leppek R; Alter P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Jun; 42(6):150-5. PubMed ID: 9312305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction.
    McNamara BP; Cristofolini L; Toni A; Taylor D
    J Biomech; 1997 Jun; 30(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 9165396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.