These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8749864)

  • 1. Analysis of the effects of measurement errors on the evaluation of propagation coefficients, in rubber tubes and canine aorta in vivo.
    Bertram CD; She J
    Technol Health Care; 1995 Dec; 3(3):161-84. PubMed ID: 8749864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wave propagation in the silicon tube: comparison of the two-point and three-point pressure methods.
    Ursino M; Artioli E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1992; 2(3):155-69. PubMed ID: 1458210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High frequency pressure propagation in viscoelastic tubes: a new experimental approach.
    Ursino M; Artioli E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1992; 2(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 1458201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of length on the fundamental resonance frequency of arterial models having radial dilatation.
    Wang YY; Lia WC; Hsiu H; Jan MY; Wang WK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Mar; 47(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 10743772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms.
    Velichko A; Wilcox PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2377-84. PubMed ID: 20370020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wave propagation in a model of the arterial circulation.
    Wang JJ; Parker KH
    J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 14996557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
    Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An experimental comparison of different methods of measuring wave propagation in viscoelastic tubes.
    Ursino M; Artioli E; Gallerani M
    J Biomech; 1994 Jul; 27(7):979-90. PubMed ID: 8063848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reflector-based phase calibration of ultrasound transducers.
    van Neer PL; Vos HJ; de Jong N
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 20537364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systemic arterial pressure wave reflections during acute hemorrhage.
    Dark P; Little R; Nirmalan M; Purdy J
    Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 34(5):1497-505. PubMed ID: 16540954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wave intensity in the ascending aorta: effects of arterial occlusion.
    Khir AW; Parker KH
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):647-55. PubMed ID: 15713284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different methods for the determination of the true wave propagation coefficient, in rubber tubes and the canine thoracic aorta.
    Bertram CD; Gow BS; Greenwald SE
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Apr; 19(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 9239640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic evaluation with TURBO BRISK--a rapid phase contrast angiography technique.
    Anayiotos AS; Kortright E; Doyle M; Walsh EG; Fuisz AR; Pohost GM
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(6):327-42. PubMed ID: 11258579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of ultrasonic velocity with improved accuracy in pulse echo setup.
    Rajagopalan S; Sharma SJ; Dubey PK
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Aug; 78(8):085104. PubMed ID: 17764352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The area of the pressure-flow loop for assessment of arterial stenosis: a new index.
    Ovadia-Blechman Z; Einav S; Zaretsky U; Castel D; Toledo E; Eldar M
    Technol Health Care; 2002; 10(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 11847447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
    Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Error analysis of tissue resistivity measurement.
    Tsai JZ; Will JA; Hubbard-Van Stelle S; Cao H; Tungjitkusolmun S; Choy YB; Haemmerich D; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):484-94. PubMed ID: 12002180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wave intensity amplification and attenuation in non-linear flow: implications for the calculation of local reflection coefficients.
    Mynard J; Penny DJ; Smolich JJ
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3314-21. PubMed ID: 19019371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.