These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8750077)

  • 21. The development of a reinforcer choice assessment scale for persons with severe and profound mental retardation.
    Matson JL; Bielecki J; Mayville EA; Smalls Y; Bamburg JW; Baglio CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 10542972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Behavioral interventions to reduce maladaptive responding in youth with dual sensory impairment. An analysis of direct and concurrent effects.
    Sisson LA; Van Hasselt VB; Hersen M
    Behav Modif; 1993 Apr; 17(2):164-88. PubMed ID: 8471010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.
    Green CW; Reid DH; White LK; Halford RC; Brittain DP; Gardner SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1988; 21(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 2967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
    Pace GM; Ivancic MT; Edwards GL; Iwata BA; Page TJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1985; 18(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 4044458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The structure of informal social networks of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.
    Kamstra A; van der Putten AA; Vlaskamp C
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2015 May; 28(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 25431193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acquisition and functional use of voice output communication by persons with profound multiple disabilities.
    Schepis MM; Reid DH; Behrman MM
    Behav Modif; 1996 Oct; 20(4):451-68. PubMed ID: 8875815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using eye gaze to identify reinforcers for individuals with severe multiple disabilities.
    Cannella-Malone HI; Sabielny LM; Tullis CA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 26173986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonambulatory persons with profound mental retardation: physical, developmental, and behavioral characteristics.
    Kobe FH; Mulick JA; Rash TA; Martin J
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(6):413-23. PubMed ID: 7871230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-control and the preference for delayed reinforcement an example in brain injury.
    Dixon MR; Horner MJ; Guercio J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 14596579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Staff perceptions of reinforcer responsiveness and aberrant behaviors in people with mental retardation.
    Bihm EM; Poindexter AR; Kienlen TL; Smith BL
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1992 Mar; 22(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 1592766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of noncontingent sensory reinforcement, contingent sensory reinforcement, and response interruption on stereotypical and self-injurious behavior.
    Sprague J; Holland K; Thomas K
    Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 9085430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Providing alternative reinforcers to facilitate tolerance to delayed reinforcement following functional communication training.
    Austin JE; Tiger JH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 25958828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of reinforcer consumption and magnitude on response rates during noncontingent reinforcement.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Rand MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):525-39. PubMed ID: 14768670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing preference for social interactions.
    Clay CJ; Samaha AL; Bloom SE; Bogoev BK; Boyle MA
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):362-71. PubMed ID: 23009945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of increased response effort on self-injury and object manipulation as competing responses.
    Zhou L; Goff GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 10738950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing preferences of individuals with acquired brain injury using alternative stimulus modalities.
    Heinicke MR; Carr JE; Eastridge D; Kupfer J; Mozzoni MP
    Brain Inj; 2013; 27(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 23252436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reinforcer rate effects and behavioral momentum in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ; Mazzitelli K; McNamara B
    Am J Ment Retard; 2003 Mar; 108(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.