168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8750444)
1. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic?
Krause W
Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of pharmacokinetics to electron-beam tomography of the abdomen.
Krause W; Gröll R; Kern R; Baumgartner C; Rienmüller R
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):487-95. PubMed ID: 10480045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blood pool and liver enhancement in CT with liposomal lodixanol: comparison with lohexol.
Desser TS; Rubin DL; Muller H; McIntire GL; Bacon ER; Toner JL
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 10898037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
Bae KT; Tran HQ; Heiken JP
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 10966725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom.
Mihl C; Wildberger JE; Jurencak T; Yanniello MJ; Nijssen EC; Kalafut JF; Nalbantov G; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Das M
Invest Radiol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):813-8. PubMed ID: 23857135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose.
Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT.
Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spiral computed tomography of the liver: contrast agent pharmacokinetics and the potential for improved hepatic enhancement.
Polger M; Seltzer SE; Head BL; Savci G; Silverman SG; Adams DF
Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9419519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols.
Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A
Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual Optimization of Contrast Media Injection Protocol at Hepatic Dynamic Computed Tomography Using Patient-Specific Contrast Enhancement Optimizer.
Matsumoto Y; Higaki T; Arataki K; Masuda T; Sato T; Fukumoto W; Nakamura Y; Tatsugami F; Awai K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 32195801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits.
Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8169097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-concentration contrast media in multiphasic abdominal multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of increased iodine flow rate on parenchymal and vascular enhancement.
Schoellnast H; Brader P; Oberdabernig B; Pisail B; Deutschmann HA; Fritz GA; Schaffler G; Tillich M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 16163023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
