These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8750444)
1. Application of pharmacokinetics to computed tomography: injection rates and schemes: mono-, bi-, or multiphasic? Krause W Invest Radiol; 1996 Feb; 31(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 8750444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of pharmacokinetics to electron-beam tomography of the abdomen. Krause W; Gröll R; Kern R; Baumgartner C; Rienmüller R Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):487-95. PubMed ID: 10480045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion. Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol. Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blood pool and liver enhancement in CT with liposomal lodixanol: comparison with lohexol. Desser TS; Rubin DL; Muller H; McIntire GL; Bacon ER; Toner JL Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 10898037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods. Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom. Mihl C; Wildberger JE; Jurencak T; Yanniello MJ; Nijssen EC; Kalafut JF; Nalbantov G; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Das M Invest Radiol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):813-8. PubMed ID: 23857135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT. Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spiral computed tomography of the liver: contrast agent pharmacokinetics and the potential for improved hepatic enhancement. Polger M; Seltzer SE; Head BL; Savci G; Silverman SG; Adams DF Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9419519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols. Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation. Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual Optimization of Contrast Media Injection Protocol at Hepatic Dynamic Computed Tomography Using Patient-Specific Contrast Enhancement Optimizer. Matsumoto Y; Higaki T; Arataki K; Masuda T; Sato T; Fukumoto W; Nakamura Y; Tatsugami F; Awai K J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 32195801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits. Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8169097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-concentration contrast media in multiphasic abdominal multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of increased iodine flow rate on parenchymal and vascular enhancement. Schoellnast H; Brader P; Oberdabernig B; Pisail B; Deutschmann HA; Fritz GA; Schaffler G; Tillich M J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 16163023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig. Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]