These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8751541)
1. Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival? Finan MA; DeCesare S; Fiorica JV; Chambers R; Hoffman MS; Kline RC; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 8751541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference? Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: should the new FIGO staging system define therapy? Grigsby PW Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 8751539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy. Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Wertheim-operation: 5-year survival of 501 consecutive patients with cervical cancer]. Papp Z; Csapó Z; Mayer A; Hupuczi P Orv Hetil; 2006 Mar; 147(12):537-45. PubMed ID: 16696377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A clinical retrospective review of stage IB1 and IB2 cervical cancer]. Shao S; Sun L; Sun L Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 21(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 11776803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis. Yasuda S; Kojima A; Maeno Y; Oki N; Miyahara Y; Sudo T; Takekida S; Yamaguchi S; Nishimura R Kobe J Med Sci; 2006; 52(1-2):9-15. PubMed ID: 16547424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic factors of stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix treated by surgery]. Zhang WH; Wu LY; Bai P; Li SM; Zhang R; Li B; Sun JH; Wu AR Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 26(8):490-2. PubMed ID: 15555341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume. Trattner M; Graf AH; Lax S; Forstner R; Dandachi N; Haas J; Pickel H; Reich O; Staudach A; Winter R Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11426955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of histology and positive lymph node involvement following radical hysterectomy in carcinoma of the cervix. Macdonald OK; Chen J; Dodson M; Lee CM; Gaffney DK Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 32(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19451800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical-pathological predictors of disease-free survival and risk groupings for IB2 cervical cancer: do the traditional models still apply? Kamelle SA; Rutledge TL; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Cohn DE; Wright J; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Aug; 94(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 15297159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a T0 radical hysterectomy specimen on survival for early stage cervical cancer. Wright JD; Grigsby PW; Rader JS; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Gao F; Gibb RK Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17698175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clusterin expression predicts survival of invasive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy. Watari H; Ohta Y; Hassan MK; Xiong Y; Tanaka S; Sakuragi N Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 18177691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma]. Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]