230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8751541)
1. Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival?
Finan MA; DeCesare S; Fiorica JV; Chambers R; Hoffman MS; Kline RC; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 8751541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: should the new FIGO staging system define therapy?
Grigsby PW
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Aug; 62(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 8751539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of survival and adverse events between women with stage IB1 and stage IB2 cervical cancer treated by laparoscopic radical vaginal hysterectomy.
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Son CE; Jeon SW; Bae JW; Eom JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 21769469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Wertheim-operation: 5-year survival of 501 consecutive patients with cervical cancer].
Papp Z; Csapó Z; Mayer A; Hupuczi P
Orv Hetil; 2006 Mar; 147(12):537-45. PubMed ID: 16696377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A clinical retrospective review of stage IB1 and IB2 cervical cancer].
Shao S; Sun L; Sun L
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 21(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 11776803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis.
Yasuda S; Kojima A; Maeno Y; Oki N; Miyahara Y; Sudo T; Takekida S; Yamaguchi S; Nishimura R
Kobe J Med Sci; 2006; 52(1-2):9-15. PubMed ID: 16547424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic factors of stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix treated by surgery].
Zhang WH; Wu LY; Bai P; Li SM; Zhang R; Li B; Sun JH; Wu AR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 26(8):490-2. PubMed ID: 15555341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume.
Trattner M; Graf AH; Lax S; Forstner R; Dandachi N; Haas J; Pickel H; Reich O; Staudach A; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11426955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of histology and positive lymph node involvement following radical hysterectomy in carcinoma of the cervix.
Macdonald OK; Chen J; Dodson M; Lee CM; Gaffney DK
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 32(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19451800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical-pathological predictors of disease-free survival and risk groupings for IB2 cervical cancer: do the traditional models still apply?
Kamelle SA; Rutledge TL; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Cohn DE; Wright J; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Aug; 94(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 15297159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a T0 radical hysterectomy specimen on survival for early stage cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Grigsby PW; Rader JS; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Gao F; Gibb RK
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17698175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study.
Benedetti-Panici P; Maneschi F; D'Andrea G; Cutillo G; Rabitti C; Congiu M; Coronetta F; Capelli A
Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2267-74. PubMed ID: 10820348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clusterin expression predicts survival of invasive cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.
Watari H; Ohta Y; Hassan MK; Xiong Y; Tanaka S; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 18177691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma].
Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG
Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
