BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8752554)

  • 1. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint.
    McAlarney ME; Stavropoulos DN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 8752554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis.
    Brosky ME; Korioth TW; Hodges J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 12644798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of attachment clips on occlusal force transmission in removable implant-supported overdentures and cantilevered superstructures.
    Kayacan R; Ballarini R; Mullen RL; Wang RR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 9109274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure and mechanical properties of Cresco-Ti laser-welded joints and stress analyses using finite element models of fixed distal extension and fixed partial prosthetic designs.
    Uysal H; Kurtoglu C; Gurbuz R; Tutuncu N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 15775924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
    Lin CL; Wang JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis.
    Lindström H; Preiskel H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11280360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical cantilever lengths versus clinical variables in fifty-five clinical cases.
    McAlarney ME; Stavropoulos DN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 10709043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
    Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis.
    Rangert B; Krogh PH; Langer B; Van Roekel N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 7615329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of a posterior implant support for extra shortened dental arches: a biomechanical model analysis.
    Maeda Y; Sogo M; Tsutsumi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):656-60. PubMed ID: 16102078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis.
    Becker CM
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 15202588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric analysis of the strength in the ''Toronto'' osseous-prosthesis system.
    Cicciù M; Risitano G; Maiorana C; Franceschini G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(1-2):9-23. PubMed ID: 19234433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical study of the effects of tooth and implant mobility differences on occlusal force transmission in tooth/implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Kayacan R; Ballarini R; Mullen RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Oct; 78(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 9338871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant screw mechanics.
    McGlumphy EA; Mendel DA; Holloway JA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 9421671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.