258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8754575)
21. Long-term Geophysical Monitoring of Simulated Clandestine Graves using Electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar Methods: 4-6 Years After Burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Roberts D; Dick HC; Wisniewski KD; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 27404604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term ground penetrating radar monitoring of a small volume DNAPL release in a natural groundwater flow field.
Hwang YK; Endres AL; Piggott SD; Parker BL
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Apr; 97(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 18258330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Excavation of a Vietnam-era aircraft crash site: use of cross-cultural understanding and dual forensic recovery methods.
Webster AD
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 9544536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A novel approach to 3D modelling ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data - A case study of a cemetery and applications for criminal investigation.
Kelly TB; Angel MN; O'Connor DE; Huff CC; Morris LE; Wach GD
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110882. PubMed ID: 34182205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrical resistivity survey to search for a recent clandestine burial of a homicide victim, UK.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Oct; 202(1-3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 20471188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of dismembered victims using UAVs, electrical tomography, and GPR over one year to aid investigations of human rights violations in Colombia, South America.
Molina CM; Wisniewski K; Heaton V; Pringle JK; Avila EF; Herrera LA; Guerrero J; Saumett M; Echeverry R; Duarte M; Baena A
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34927732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Search for "Fred": An Unusual Vertical Burial Case.
Wisniewski KD; Cooper N; Heaton V; Hope C; Pirrie D; Mitten AJ; Pringle JK
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1530-1539. PubMed ID: 30802952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Geophysical imaging of buried human remains in simulated mass and single graves: Experiment design and results from pre-burial to six months after burial.
Doro KO; Kolapkar AM; Bank CG; Wescott DJ; Mickleburgh HL
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jun; 335():111289. PubMed ID: 35397358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The place of a forensic archaeologist at a crime scene involving a buried body.
Menez LL
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):311-5. PubMed ID: 15922529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Experimental forensic scenes for the characterization of ground-penetrating radar wave response.
Solla M; Riveiro B; Álvarez MX; Arias P
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jul; 220(1-3):50-8. PubMed ID: 22306187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Discovery of a mass grave from the Spanish Civil War using Ground Penetrating Radar and forensic archaeology.
Fernández-Álvarez JP; Rubio-Melendi D; Martínez-Velasco A; Pringle JK; Aguilera HD
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():e10-e17. PubMed ID: 27318840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Measurement of ninhydrin reactive nitrogen influx into gravesoil during aboveground and belowground carcass (Sus domesticus) decomposition.
Van Belle LE; Carter DO; Forbes SL
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):37-41. PubMed ID: 19773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Molecular study of time dependent changes in DNA stability in soil buried skeletal residues.
Kaiser C; Bachmeier B; Conrad C; Nerlich A; Bratzke H; Eisenmenger W; Peschel O
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 May; 177(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18063334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The forensic geophysical controlled research site of the University of Brasilia, Brazil: Results from methods GPR and electrical resistivity tomography.
Cavalcanti MM; Rocha MP; Blum MLB; Borges WR
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Dec; 293():101.e1-101.e21. PubMed ID: 30384988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preliminary soilwater conductivity analysis to date clandestine burials of homicide victims.
Pringle JK; Cassella JP; Jervis JR
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):126-33. PubMed ID: 20211533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Forensic archeology and the need for flexible excavation strategies: a case study.
Hoshower LM
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9456525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States.
Butnor JR; Doolittle JA; Kress L; Cohen S; Johnsen KH
Tree Physiol; 2001 Nov; 21(17):1269-78. PubMed ID: 11696414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Time-lapse resistivity surveys over simulated clandestine graves.
Jervis JR; Pringle JK; Tuckwell GW
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):7-13. PubMed ID: 19646828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Taphonomic mycota: fungi with forensic potential.
Carter DO; Tibbett M
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):168-71. PubMed ID: 12570221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Forensic geophysics: ground penetrating radar (GPR) techniques and missing persons investigations.
Barone PM; Di Maggio RM
Forensic Sci Res; 2019; 4(4):337-340. PubMed ID: 32002492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
