These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8755699)

  • 21. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
    Beeby E; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exchange delays and impulsive choice in adult humans.
    Hyten C; Madden GJ; Field DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Sep; 62(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 7964366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8755700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 21541170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 17343994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 26676182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.
    Widholm JJ; Silberberg A; Hursh SR; Imam AA; Warren-Boulton FR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Nov; 76(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 11768710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reinforcer accumulation in a token-reinforcement context with pigeons.
    Yankelevitz RL; Bullock CE; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 19070337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality.
    Neef NA; Mace FC; Shade D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 8473257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Memory without awareness: pigeons do not show metamemory in delayed matching to sample.
    Sutton JE; Shettleworth SJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 18426309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Powell RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2794844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.
    DeLeon IG; Chase JA; Frank-Crawford MA; Carreau-Webster AB; Triggs MM; Bullock CE; Jennett HK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 24782203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.