These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8755699)

  • 41. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm.
    Alessandri J; Lattal KA; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():26-31. PubMed ID: 23206903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE; Rodriguez ML; Kabela E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Sep; 46(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 3760749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE; Kralik JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3746189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Enhancing tolerance to delayed reinforcers: the role of intervening activities.
    Dixon MR; Rehfeldt RA; Randich L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 12858992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Exploring a concurrent-chains paradox: decreasing preference as an initial link is shortened.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jan; 31(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 15656723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of budget and reinforcement location on risk-sensitive preference.
    O'Daly M; Case DA; Fantino E
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 16737783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) delay gratification by choosing token exchange over immediate reward consumption.
    Beran MJ; Evans TA
    Am J Primatol; 2012 Sep; 74(9):864-70. PubMed ID: 22674686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3346621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE; Romano A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Nov; 58(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 1447543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.
    Spetch ML; Belke TW; Barnet RC; Dunn R; Pierce WD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 2324664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2921590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11394485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.