These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8755762)

  • 1. Biomechanical characteristics of C1-2 cable fixations.
    Dickman CA; Crawford NR; Paramore CG
    J Neurosurg; 1996 Aug; 85(2):316-22. PubMed ID: 8755762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior fixations. Cable, graft, and screw combinations.
    Naderi S; Crawford NR; Song GS; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Sep; 23(18):1946-55; discussion 1955-6. PubMed ID: 9779526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of an atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion cage with C1-C2 pedicle fixation.
    Li S; Ni B; Xie N; Wang M; Guo X; Zhang F; Wang J; Zhao W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):E624-32. PubMed ID: 20505567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.
    Härtl R; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; Chou D; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Oct; 5(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 17048771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
    Melcher RP; Puttlitz CM; Kleinstueck FS; Lotz JC; Harms J; Bradford DS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2435-40. PubMed ID: 12435971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of C1-2 posterior fixation techniques.
    Hott JS; Lynch JJ; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Feb; 2(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 15739530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical investigation of a novel integrated device for intra-articular stabilization of the C1-C2 (atlantoaxial) joint.
    Robertson PA; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22341395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential biomechanical effects of injury and wiring at C1-C2.
    Crawford NR; Hurlbert RJ; Choi WG; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(18):1894-902. PubMed ID: 10515013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
    Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.
    Lapsiwala SB; Anderson PA; Oza A; Resnick DK
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Mar; 58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. PubMed ID: 16528192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.
    Elgafy H; Potluri T; Goel VK; Foster S; Faizan A; Kulkarni N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 20081561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques.
    Richter M; Schmidt R; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(16):1724-32. PubMed ID: 12195062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.
    Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Hokari Y; Neale PG; Zhao C; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; An KN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):E363-70. PubMed ID: 17545899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
    Takigawa T; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Hong JT; Ito Y; Inoue N; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical study of atlantoaxial arthrodesis: transarticular screw fixation versus modified Brooks posterior wiring.
    Mitchell TC; Sadasivan KK; Ogden AL; Mayeux RH; Mukherjee DP; Albright JA
    J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(7):483-9. PubMed ID: 10513970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability analysis of craniovertebral junction fixation techniques.
    Puttlitz CM; Melcher RP; Kleinstueck FS; Harms J; Bradford DS; Lotz JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 14996883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of five different atlantoaxial posterior fixation techniques.
    Henriques T; Cunningham BW; Olerud C; Shimamoto N; Lee GA; Larsson S; McAfee PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(22):2877-83. PubMed ID: 11074673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dorsal atlanto-axial screw fixation. A stability test in vitro and in vivo].
    Grob D; Dvorák J; Panjabi MM; Hayek J
    Orthopade; 1991 Apr; 20(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 2067842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
    Grob D; Crisco JJ; Panjabi MM; Wang P; Dvorak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1992 May; 17(5):480-90. PubMed ID: 1621145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability.
    Kim SM; Lim TJ; Paterno J; Hwang TJ; Lee KW; Balabhadra RS; Kim DH
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3 Suppl Spine):277-83. PubMed ID: 15029916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.