127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8756151)
1. [Contrast medium assisted dynamic MR-mammography after diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the breast].
Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Kopka L; Kahlen O; Grabbe E
Bildgebung; 1996 Jun; 63(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8756151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dynamic contrast medium studies with flash sequences in nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of the breast].
Heywang SH; Hilbertz T; Pruss E; Wolf A; Permanetter W; Eiermann W; Lissner J
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Mar; 8(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 3383539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quantitative assessment of therapy related effects after breast conserving therapy with dynamic MRI of the breast].
Wersebe A; Xydeas T; Clauss T; Dietz K; Belka C; Fersis N; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Dec; 173(12):1109-17. PubMed ID: 11740672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Haustein J; Pohl C; Beck R; Lommatzsch B; Untch M; Nathrath WB
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):639-46. PubMed ID: 8184040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography.
Brinck U; Fischer U; Korabiowska M; Jutrowski M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1331-4. PubMed ID: 9129437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast. Work in progress.
Pierce WB; Harms SE; Flamig DP; Griffey RH; Evans WP; Hagans JE
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 1947093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MRI-controlled intervention in suspected lesions of the breast].
Vosshenrich R; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Apr; 56(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8682281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Contrast media in MR mammography].
Tontsch P; Bauer M; Birmelin G; von Landenberg E; Moeller TB; Raible G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 9172669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. II. The capacity to differentiate malignant and benign lesions in MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Gieseke J; Elevelt A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 7605960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Combination of low and high resolution T1-weighted sequences for improved evaluation of morphologic criteria in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast].
Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Schreiber WG; Schmidt M; Thelen M
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12424673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Technics for the preoperative marking of nonpalpable breast lesions in MRT].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Müller-Lisse U; Untch M; Bohmert H; Reiser M
Rofo; 1996 Jul; 165(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 8765369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
