These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8756238)

  • 1. [Cardio-circulatory response to laryngoscopy. Comparative study between Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes].
    Castillo J; Castaño J; Escolano F; Arilla M
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1996; 43(6):219-21. PubMed ID: 8756238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Which laryngoscope is the most stressful in laryngoscopy; Macintosh, Miller, or McCoy?].
    Nishiyama T; Higashizawa T; Bito H; Konishi A; Sakai T
    Masui; 1997 Nov; 46(11):1519-24. PubMed ID: 9404140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using McCoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients: the comparison of haemodynamic changes with Macintosh blade in a randomized trial.
    Tewari P; Gupta D; Kumar A; Singh U
    J Postgrad Med; 2005; 51(4):260-4; discussion 264-5. PubMed ID: 16388166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of the distance between the upper incisors and the laryngoscope blade during laryngoscopy: comparisons of the McCoy, the Macintosh, the Miller, and the Belscope blades].
    Bito H; Nishiyama T; Higarhizawa T; Sakai T; Konishi A
    Masui; 1998 Oct; 47(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 9834604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Hemodynamic response to intubation with Macintosh and McCoy blades].
    Román J; Beltrán de Heredia B; García-Velasco P; Parramón F; García R; Vilaplana J; Villalonga A
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1996 May; 43(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 8753922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Flexiblade levering laryngoscope with the English Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a poor laryngoscopic view.
    Beilin B; Yardeni IZ; Smolyarenko V; Zeidel A; Ram E; Mayburd E
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 15766344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new Viewmax laryngoscope in a simulated difficult airway.
    Leung YY; Hung CT; Tan ST
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 May; 50(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 16643225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation using the McCoy laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh and the Miller laryngoscopes].
    Konishi A; Sakai T; Nishiyama T; Higashizawa T; Bito H
    Masui; 1997 Jan; 46(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 9028096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of lighted stylet (Surch-Lite) and direct laryngoscopic intubation in patients with high Mallampati scores.
    Rhee KY; Lee JR; Kim J; Park S; Kwon WK; Han S
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1215-9. PubMed ID: 19299790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.
    McCoy EP; Mirakhur RK; McCloskey BV
    Anaesthesia; 1995 Nov; 50(11):943-6. PubMed ID: 8678248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Willems RJ; Beeke LP; Schaaper JN; van Dobbelsteen J; Wieringa PA
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 19095848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical assessment of Glidescope in orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
    Xue FS; Zhang GH; Liu J; Li XY; Yang QY; Xu YC; Li CW
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2007 Sep; 73(9):451-7. PubMed ID: 17660737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the GlideScope video laryngoscope in pediatric patients.
    Redel A; Karademir F; Schlitterlau A; Frommer M; Scholtz LU; Kranke P; Kehl F; Roewer N; Lange M
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Jul; 19(7):667-71. PubMed ID: 19638111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiovascular responses following laryngoscope assisted, fibreoptic orotracheal intubation.
    Tong JL; Ashworth DR; Smith JE
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Aug; 60(8):754-8. PubMed ID: 16029223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults.
    Cheung RW; Irwin MG; Law BC; Chan CK
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 16428574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial.
    Maharaj CH; O'Croinin D; Curley G; Harte BH; Laffey JG
    Anaesthesia; 2006 Nov; 61(11):1093-9. PubMed ID: 17042849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skin vasomotor reflex induced by laryngoscopy: comparison of the McCoy and Macintosh blades.
    Shimoda O; Ikuta Y; Isayama S; Sakamoto M; Terasaki H
    Br J Anaesth; 1997 Dec; 79(6):714-8. PubMed ID: 9496201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dose-related effects of bolus esmolol on heart rate and blood pressure following laryngoscopy and intubation.
    Bensky KP; Donahue-Spencer L; Hertz GE; Anderson MT; James R
    AANA J; 2000 Oct; 68(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 11759128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of the practice of endotracheal intubation by levering Laryngoscope in teaching of undergraduate medical students].
    Higashizawa T; Bito H; Nishiyama T; Sakai T; Konishi A
    Masui; 1997 Sep; 46(9):1255-8. PubMed ID: 9311221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.