194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8756911)
21. A new test phantom with different breast tissue compositions for image quality assessment in conventional and digital mammography.
Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5267-81. PubMed ID: 15656276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.
Mou X; Chen X; Sun L; Yu H; Ji Z; Zhang L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6321-36. PubMed ID: 18936520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.
Laidevant AD; Malkov S; Flowers CI; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 20175478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Phase-contrast x-ray imaging with x-ray interferometer for medical applications].
Takeda T; Yoneyama A; Momose A; Wu J; Zeniya T; Lwin TT; Tsuchiya Y; Rao DV; Hyodo K; Hirano K; Aiyoshi Y; Itai Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 12766294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography.
Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Schnyder P; Valley JF
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3509-23. PubMed ID: 11131181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.
Ruiz-Gonzalez Y; Perez-Diaz M; Martínez-Aguila D; Diaz-Barreto M; Fleitas I; Mora-Machado R; Rigon L; Tromba G; Bregant P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Feb; 11(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 26092659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. First application of computed radiology to mammography with synchrotron radiation.
Quai E; Longo R; Zanconati F; Jaconelli G; Tonutti M; Abrami A; Arfelli F; Dreossi D; Tromba G; Cova MA
Radiol Med; 2013 Feb; 118(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 22744351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement.
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Jeunehomme F; Muller S; Hamm B; Bick U
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):397-404. PubMed ID: 15973130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Short communication: anomalous image quality phantom scores in magnification mammography: evidence of phase contrast enhancement.
Kotre CJ; Birch IP; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):170-3. PubMed ID: 11893641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prototype of a quasi-monochromatic system for mammography applications.
Baldelli P; Taibi A; Tuffanelli A; Gilardoni MC; Gambaccini M
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):2225-40. PubMed ID: 15876663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a compact synchrotron source.
Heck L; Dierolf M; Jud C; Eggl E; Sellerer T; Mechlem K; Günther B; Achterhold K; Gleich B; Metz S; Pfeiffer D; Kröninger K; Herzen J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222816. PubMed ID: 31600236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Synchrotron-based coherent scatter x-ray projection imaging using an array of monoenergetic pencil beams.
Landheer K; Johns PC
Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Sep; 83(9):095114. PubMed ID: 23020426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast cancellation technique applied to digital x-ray imaging using silicon strip detectors.
Avila C; Lopez J; Sanabria JC; Baldazzi G; Bollini D; Gombia M; Cabal AE; Ceballos C; Diaz Garcia A; Gambaccini M; Taibi A; Sarnelli A; Tuffanelli A; Giubellino P; Marzari-Chiesa A; Prino F; Tomassi E; Grybos P; Idzik M; Swientek K; Wiacek P; Montaño LM; Ramello L; Sitta M
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3755-66. PubMed ID: 16475775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose-compatible grating-based phase-contrast mammography on mastectomy specimens using a compact synchrotron source.
Eggl E; Grandl S; Sztrόkay-Gaul A; Dierolf M; Jud C; Heck L; Burger K; Günther B; Achterhold K; Mayr D; Wilkens JJ; Auweter SD; Gleich B; Hellerhoff K; Reiser MF; Pfeiffer F; Herzen J
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15700. PubMed ID: 30356116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [First experiments for the detection of simulated mammographic lesions: digital full field mammography with a new detector with a double plate of pure selenium].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Adamietz B; Lell M; Anders K; Uder M
Radiologe; 2011 Feb; 51(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 21069512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
