These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8756911)
41. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography. Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography? Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Imaging lobular breast carcinoma: comparison of synchrotron radiation DEI-CT technique with clinical CT, mammography and histology. Fiedler S; Bravin A; Keyriläinen J; Fernández M; Suortti P; Thomlinson W; Tenhunen M; Virkkunen P; Karjalainen-Lindsberg M Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 15083665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Quantitative analysis of the effect of energy separation in k-edge digital subtraction imaging. Sarnelli A; Taibi A; Baldelli P; Gambaccini M; Bravin A Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3015-26. PubMed ID: 17505086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A method for 3D electron density imaging using single scattered x-rays with application to mammographic screening. Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5445-59. PubMed ID: 18765886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Energy, angular and spatial distributions of primary electrons inside photoconducting materials for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies. Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6439-60. PubMed ID: 17951854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Pawluczyk O; Augustine BJ; Yaffe MJ; Rico D; Yang J; Mawdsley GE; Boyd NF Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 12674236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study. Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A software platform for phase contrast x-ray breast imaging research. Bliznakova K; Russo P; Mettivier G; Requardt H; Popov P; Bravin A; Buliev I Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jun; 61():62-74. PubMed ID: 25864165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom. Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography. Pisano ED; Johnston RE; Chapman D; Geradts J; Iacocca MV; Livasy CA; Washburn DB; Sayers DE; Zhong Z; Kiss MZ; Thomlinson WC Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):895-901. PubMed ID: 10715065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Tissue Cancellation in Dual Energy Mammography Using a Calibration Phantom Customized for Direct Mapping. Han S; Kang DG IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 24043372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium. Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results. Pani S; Longo R; Dreossi D; Montanari F; Olivo A; Arfelli F; Bergamaschi A; Poropat P; Rigon L; Zanconati F; Dalla Palma L; Castelli E Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(9):1739-54. PubMed ID: 15152928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging. Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In-line phase-contrast breast tomosynthesis: a phantom feasibility study at a synchrotron radiation facility. Bliznakova K; Russo P; Kamarianakis Z; Mettivier G; Requardt H; Bravin A; Buliev I Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):6243-63. PubMed ID: 27486086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography. Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]