229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8757494)
1. Divided attention and indirect memory tests.
Mulligan NW; Hartman M
Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 8757494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory.
Flory P; Pring L
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 7754080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limits of the processing view in accounting for dissociations among memory measures in a clinical population.
Schwartz BL; Rosse RB; Deutsch SI
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 8433649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention and implicit memory tests: the effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9046866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall.
Isingrini M; Vazou F; Leroy P
Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 7666759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Priming and aging: further evidence of preserved memory function.
Java RI; Gardiner JM
Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 2058759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.
Schmitter-Edgecombe M
Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):512-25. PubMed ID: 10355240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does organization improve priming?
Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 9438952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Encoding tasks dissociate the effects of divided attention on category-cued recall and category-exemplar generation.
Parker A; Dagnall N; Munley G
Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 22172981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory.
Nyberg L; Nilsson LG
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):215-9. PubMed ID: 7753951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality.
Kelley CM; Jacoby LL; Hollingshead A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 2530308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conceptual implicit memory performance in Alzheimer's disease.
Lazzara MM; Yonelinas AP; Ober BA
Neuropsychology; 2001 Oct; 15(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 11761037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1067-87. PubMed ID: 8805816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Examination of relation among the generation effect, the level-of-processing effect, and the modality effect in explicit memory tasks].
Okada K
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1998 Apr; 69(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9691348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory.
Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN; Lafronza VN
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1185-91. PubMed ID: 2530311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
