These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8759232)

  • 41. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications.
    Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The right to die.
    Crisostomo JP; David CH; Mesina DG; Pio de Roda AZ; Tankiang SY
    Philipp Law J; 1980 Sep; 55(3rd Quarter):338-82. PubMed ID: 16047423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. End-of-life care: what do the American courts say?
    Luce JM; Alpers A
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2 Suppl):N40-5. PubMed ID: 11228572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [The supreme court and assisted suicide: the ultimate right?].
    Angell M
    Riv Inferm; 1998; 17(4):225-7. PubMed ID: 10446620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Decision-making at the end of life: the termination of life-prolonging treatment, euthanasia (mercy-killing) and assisted suicide in Canada in South Africa.
    Sneiderman B; McQuoid-Mason D
    Comp Int Law J South Afr; 2000 Jul; 33(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 12425314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Euthanasia: a comparison of the criminal laws of Germany, Switzerland and the United States.
    Sayid MD
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):533-62. PubMed ID: 11649614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy.
    Cole SS; Shea MS
    Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The right to die in Canadian legislation, case law and legal doctrine.
    Plachta M
    Med Law; 1994; 13(7-8):639-80. PubMed ID: 7731350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The alleged distinction between euthanasia and the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: conceptually incoherent and impossible to maintain.
    Orentlicher D
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(3):837-59. PubMed ID: 12071210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
    Hughes R
    J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
    Pratt DA
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Why withholding treatment is not assisted suicide.
    Culver KC; Cupples B
    Health Law Can; 1999 Nov; 20(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 10747745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
    Harber SM
    Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comment on Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [2002] 2 All England Reports 449.
    Stauch M
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 12161574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
    Kadish SH
    Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
    Stewart C
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Physician-assisted suicide: the legal slippery slope.
    Walker RM
    Cancer Control; 2001; 8(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11176033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B.
    Coleman D; Drake S
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 12161578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
    Meilaender G
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.