These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Experimental Study on the Perception Characteristics of Haptic Texture by Multidimensional Scaling. Wu J; Li N; Liu W; Song G; Zhang J IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(4):410-20. PubMed ID: 26054074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A random set view of texture classification. Epifanio I; Ayala G IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(8):859-67. PubMed ID: 18244680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers. Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration. Yoshioka T; Bensmaïa SJ; Craig JC; Hsiao SS Somatosens Mot Res; 2007; 24(1-2):53-70. PubMed ID: 17558923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Random field models in the textural analysis of ultrasonic images of the liver. Bleck JS; Ranft U; Gebel M; Hecker H; Westhoff-Bleck M; Thiesemann C; Wagner S; Manns M IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(6):796-801. PubMed ID: 18215959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture. Knill DC Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(17):2635-56. PubMed ID: 12116709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Texture segregation with luminance and chromatic contrast. McIlhagga W; Hine T; Cole GR; Snyder AW Vision Res; 1990; 30(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 2336806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentive texture similarity as a categorization task: Comparing texture synthesis models. Balas B Pattern Recognit; 2008 Mar; 41(3):972-982. PubMed ID: 20890384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low dimensional adaptive texture feature vectors from class distance and class difference matrices. Nielsen B; Albregtsen F; Danielsen HE IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jan; 23(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 14719689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of simulated texture patterns on the human hand. Kops CE; Gardner EP J Neurophysiol; 1996 Aug; 76(2):1145-65. PubMed ID: 8871227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stain on texture: perception of a dark spot having a blurred edge on textured backgrounds. Sawayama M; Kimura E Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109():209-20. PubMed ID: 25542275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-dimensional gray-scale clustering for texture analysis. Yoshiura K; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Shibaki N; Ban S; Araki K; Kanda S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 9442601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conveying shape with texture: experimental investigations of texture's effects on shape categorization judgments. Kim S; Hagh-Shenas H; Interrante V IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2004; 10(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 18579974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nuclear morphometry and texture analysis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: utility in subclassification on cytosmears. Gupta S; Gupta R; Singh S; Gupta K; Kudesia M Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Feb; 38(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 19688760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]