These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8759810)

  • 1. Chronic rise in defibrillation threshold with a hybrid lead system.
    Tummala RV; Riggio DR; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8759810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A second defibrillator chest patch electrode will increase implantation rates for nonthoracotomy defibrillators.
    Solomon AJ; Swartz JF; Rodak DJ; Moore HJ; Hannan RL; Tracy CM; Fletcher RD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1304-10. PubMed ID: 9005417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using a transvenous lead system.
    Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 8759811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds.
    Robinson LA; Windle JR; Easley AR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 May; 57(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 8179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Kirk MM; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 38(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 11583896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 9(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 14618062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defibrillation thresholds are increased by right-sided implantation of totally transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Friedman PA; Rasmussen MJ; Grice S; Trusty J; Glikson M; Stanton MS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1186-92. PubMed ID: 10461295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of successful defibrillation threshold test during CRT-D implantation.
    Przybylski A; Oreziak A; Lewandowski Z; Hasiec A; Orczykowski M; Walczak F
    Kardiol Pol; 2010 May; 68(5):512-8. PubMed ID: 20491010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with successful implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems.
    Schwartzman D; Concato J; Ren JF; Callans DJ; Gottlieb CD; Preminger MW; Marchlinski FE
    Am Heart J; 1996 Jun; 131(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8644591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for defibrillation using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Wyse DG; Kavanagh KM; Gillis AM; Mitchell LB; Duff HJ; Sheldon RS; Kieser TM; Maitland A; Flanagan P; Rothschild J
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 8421983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.
    Weiss DN; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 2(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9870022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems.
    Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Williamson BD; Man KC; Horwood L; Schmittou A; Kalbfleisch SJ; Langberg JJ
    Circulation; 1994 Aug; 90(2):868-72. PubMed ID: 8044958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with elevated impedance with a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system.
    Kontos MC; Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Damiano RJ; Akosah KO; Nixon JV; Stambler BS
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 79(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 9024735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rise in chronic defibrillation thresholds in nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator.
    Venditti FJ; Martin DT; Vassolas G; Bowen S
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):216-23. PubMed ID: 8281649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of shock polarity on biphasic defibrillation thresholds using an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 9581951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elevated defibrillation threshold when right-sided venous access is used for nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead implantation. The Endotak Investigators.
    Epstein AE; Kay GN; Plumb VJ; Voshage-Stahl L; Hull ML
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 6(11):979-86. PubMed ID: 8589875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable defibrillator: how effective is the subcutaneous finger lead?
    Osswald BR; De Simone R; Most S; Tochtermann U; Tanzeem A; Karck M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 19144533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
    Zienciuk A; Lubiński A; Królak T; Lewicka-Nowak E; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G
    Kardiol Pol; 2007 May; 65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2. PubMed ID: 17577846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.