These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8759948)

  • 1. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes.
    Ozturan O; Oysu C
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9925024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Kuroda T; Fukuda S; Chida E; Kashiwamura M; Matsumura M; Ohwatari R; Inuyama Y
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2001 May; 28 Suppl():S33-8. PubMed ID: 11683340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1460-70. PubMed ID: 10738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic characteristics of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infants and children.
    Prieve BA; Fitzgerald TS; Schulte LE; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2871-9. PubMed ID: 9373974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Thompson S; Henin S; Long GR
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects.
    Lasky RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):981-91. PubMed ID: 9479751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of AC and DC stimulation on chinchilla SOAE amplitude and frequency.
    Sun W; Ding D; Reyes S; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 11077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modifications of a single saturating non-linearity account for post-onset changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Lukashkin AN; Russell IJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1561-8. PubMed ID: 12398462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.
    Cheatham MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 24(4):413-428. PubMed ID: 37464091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.