These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8759963)

  • 1. A comparison of speech envelopes of stutters and nonstutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1105-10. PubMed ID: 8759963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference of susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback between stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Fukawa T; Yoshioka H; Ozawa E; Yoshida S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 3172765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting results of the fluent speech paradigm in stuttering research: difficulties in separating cause from effect.
    Armson J; Kalinowski J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 8170133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Healey EC
    J Commun Disord; 1982 Jan; 15(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 7061731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constancy of relative timing for stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 3230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Lechner BK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 491561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematic analysis of lip closure in stutterers' fluent speech.
    McClean MD; Kroll RM; Loftus NS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):755-60. PubMed ID: 2273888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of period-by-period fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers over repeated utterances.
    Sacco PR; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 2739393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Articulatory dynamics of fluent utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Zimmermann G
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 7442187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and physiological reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Peters HF; Hulstijn W; Starkweather CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 2779210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.
    Bosshardt HG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):776-85. PubMed ID: 2273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic evidence of aberrant velocities in stutterers' fluent speech.
    Pindzola RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 3503243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variables affecting stutterer's initial reactions to delayed auditory feedback.
    Burke BD
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Jun; 8(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 803158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delayed auditory feedback and the speech of stuttering and non-stuttering children.
    Timmons BA; Boudreau JP
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 662555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of stutterers' and nonstutterers' affective, cognitive, and behavioral self-reports.
    Watson JB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 3172754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physiological factors related to delayed auditory feedback and stuttering: a review.
    Timmons BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 2):1179-89. PubMed ID: 7167308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coordination of aerodynamic and phonatory processes in fluent speech utterances of stutterers.
    Peters HF; Boves L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):352-61. PubMed ID: 3172752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual assessment of normalcy of speech following stuttering therapy.
    Ingham RJ; Packman AC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Mar; 21(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 642489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-related reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers: diagnostic implications.
    Bakker K; Brutten GJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 May; 55(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 2329792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stuttering and speech naturalness.
    Martin RR; Haroldson SK; Triden KA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Feb; 49(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 6700202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.