These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8760705)

  • 1. Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery.
    Allman AC; Genevier ES; Johnson MR; Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Aug; 103(8):769-75. PubMed ID: 8760705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 1. The temporal relation between head-to-cervix force and intrauterine pressure during labour.
    Allman AC; Genevier ES; Johnson MR; Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Aug; 103(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 8760704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head-to-cervix forces and their relationship to the outcome of labor.
    Gough GW; Randall NJ; Genevier ES; Sutherland IA; Steer PJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 2314780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous monitoring of head-to-cervix forces, intrauterine pressure and cervical dilatation during labour.
    Antonucci MC; Pitman MC; Eid T; Steer PJ; Genevier ES
    Med Eng Phys; 1997 Jun; 19(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 9302671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical dilatation of the cervix at non-labour caesarean section for reducing postoperative morbidity.
    Liabsuetrakul T; Peeyananjarassri K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD008019. PubMed ID: 22071843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What cervical dilatation rate during active labour should be considered abnormal?
    Perl FM; Hunter DJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern of cervical dilatation in previous lower segment caesarean section patients.
    Guleria K; Dhall GI; Dhall K
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1997 May; 95(5):131-4. PubMed ID: 9357257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidae.
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Vasant RV; Cooper DJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jan; 89(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7059543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labour management: an appraisal of the role of false labour and latent phase on the delivery mode.
    Gharoro EP; Enabudoso EJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 17000500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction.
    Alvarez-Colomo C; Gobernado-Tejedor JA
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 293(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 26066659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of cervical smooth muscle activity to the duration of latent and active phases of labour.
    Pajntar M; Leskosek B; Rudel D; Verdenik I
    BJOG; 2001 May; 108(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 11368141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Marti Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Campillos Maza JM; Castán Mateo S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 28315935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal blood sampling in early labour: is there an increased risk of operative delivery and fetal morbidity?
    Heazell AE; Riches J; Hopkins L; Myers JE
    BJOG; 2011 Jun; 118(7):849-55. PubMed ID: 21401852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases.
    Atad J; Hallak M; Ben-David Y; Auslender R; Abramovici H
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jan; 104(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8988692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound examination at term for predicting the outcome of delivery in women with a previous cesarean section.
    Comas M; Cochs B; Martí L; Ruiz R; Maireles S; Costa J; Canet Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Dec; 29(23):3870-4. PubMed ID: 26833253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographical predictive markers of failure of induction of labour in term pregnancy.
    Brik M; Mateos S; Fernandez-Buhigas I; Garbayo P; Costa G; Santacruz B
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 37(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 27924657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
    Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.