These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8760844)

  • 1. Bracket angulation as a function of its length in the canine distal movement.
    Matasa CG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 8760844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise brackets.
    Voudouris JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):119-40. PubMed ID: 9057612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Shibaguchi T; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):285-90; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 1763839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire.
    Garner LD; Allai WW; Moore BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Sep; 90(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 3463195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of bracket design on frictional losses in the bracket/arch wire system.
    Schumacher HA; Bourauel C; Drescher D
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):335-47. PubMed ID: 10546416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth--a typodont experimental study.
    Shen G; Chen RJ; Hu Z; Qian YF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 18678759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M; Defraia E; Barbato E
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 19413392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
    Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of second-order couple on the application of torque.
    Meling TR; Odegaard J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 9517715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system.
    Rhee JN; Chun YS; Row J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 11244423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic forces released by low-friction versus conventional systems during alignment of apically or buccally malposed teeth.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M; Defraia E
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 20631083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque.
    Al Fakir H; Carey JP; Melenka GW; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 24596162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.