128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8761390)
21. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does endorectal coil MRI increase the accuracy of preoperative prostate cancer staging?
Pooli A; Isharwal S; Cook G; Oliveto JM; LaGrange CA
Can J Urol; 2016 Dec; 23(6):8564-8567. PubMed ID: 27995852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schnall M; Tomaszewski J; Schultz D; Kao G; VanArsdalen K; Wein A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 7928457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.
May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Wang L; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Schwartz LH; Eberhardt SC; Chen HN; Scardino PT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16498101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Assessment of local staging of prostate cancer by endorectal surface coil].
Miki K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Aug; 56(8):2046-51. PubMed ID: 9750505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz B; Schnall M; Schultz D; Cote K; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
J Urol; 2000 Sep; 164(3 Pt 1):759-63. PubMed ID: 10953141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience.
Fütterer JJ; Heijmink SW; Scheenen TW; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 16304091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of percent positive biopsies and endorectal coil MRI in predicting prognosis in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schultz D; Schnall M; Tomaszewski JE; Wein A
Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 9166555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the local staging of prostate cancer.
Otto J; Thörmer G; Seiwerts M; Fuchs J; Garnov N; Franz T; Horn LC; Do MH; Stolzenburg JU; Kahn T; Moche M; Busse H
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):795-802. PubMed ID: 24557601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [What may be expected from endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local extension of cancer of the prostate?].
Cornud F; Belin X; Fromont G; Chretien Y; Helenon O; Boisrond L; Casanova JM; Meuriot T; Moreau JM; Dufour B
J Urol (Paris); 1991; 97(4-5):179-88. PubMed ID: 1761861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Nepple KG; Rosevear HM; Stolpen AH; Brown JA; Williams RD
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):601-6. PubMed ID: 21665495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Wang JH; Chen KK; Chiang H; Teng MH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1998 May; 61(5):243-52. PubMed ID: 9650427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S
BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
