These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8761397)
1. Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging. Müller RD; Von Koschitzki T; Hirche H; John V; Hering K; Gocke C; Turowski B Clin Radiol; 1996 Aug; 51(8):577-86. PubMed ID: 8761397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lung nodule conspicuity using unsharp mask filters with storage-phosphor-based computed radiography. Li F; Sone S; Kiyono K Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 9059410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography]. Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Awai K; Komi M; Hori S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard versus inverted digital luminescence radiography in detecting pulmonary nodules: a ROC analysis. Kirchner J; Gadek D; Goltz JP; Doroch-Gadek A; Stückradt S; Liermann D; Kickuth R Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1799-803. PubMed ID: 23756324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography. Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparison of digital luminescence radiography and the conventional film-screen technic in pulmonary coin lesions--a clinical study]. Schwermer B; Witte G; Spielmann RP; Nicolas V; Fassbender T Rofo; 1990 Aug; 153(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2168071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of varying filter kernel sizes on the image quality of interstitial lung diseases. Müller RD; Herting D; Hirche H; John V; Buddenbrock B; Gocke P; Wiebringhaus R; Braunschweig R; Voss M; Mohnke M; Konietzko N Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 8915285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of digital radiography and conventional X-ray in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule with receiver operating characteristic analysis]. Duan G; Chen WG; Wang JY; Huang XH; Wang Y; Lu W Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 23(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 12810395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of lung filter, asymmetric film-screen technique and digital storage screen radiography in diagnosis of coin lesion]. Müller RD; Hirche H; Wähling S; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; Turowski B; John V; Blendl C; Langer R Pneumologie; 1997 Mar; 51(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 9173420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of radiologist and CAD performance in the detection of CT-confirmed subtle pulmonary nodules on digital chest radiographs. Bley TA; Baumann T; Saueressig U; Pache G; Treier M; Schaefer O; Neitzel U; Langer M; Kotter E Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 18496038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. MacMahon H Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1169-77. PubMed ID: 10903706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital tomosynthesis of the thorax: the influence of respiratory motion artifacts on lung nodule detection. Kim SM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Kang H; Song IY; Lee EJ; Hwang HS Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 23528563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital image intensifier radiography and film-screen combinations in pulmonary nodules]. Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Jenett M Rofo; 1989 Aug; 151(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2548236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of small peripheral lung cancer by digital chest radiography. Performance of unprocessed versus unsharp mask-processed images. Yang ZG; Sone S; Li F; Takashima S; Maruyama Y; Hasegawa M; Hanamura K; Asakura K Acta Radiol; 1999 Sep; 40(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 10485239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gray-scale reversal for the detection of pulmonary nodules on a PACS workstation. De Boo DW; Uffmann M; Bipat S; Boorsma EF; Scheerder MJ; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop CM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1096-100. PubMed ID: 22021501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]