These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762237)
1. [Interpretation of an epidemiological survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality]. Bastuji-Garin S Rev Prat; 1996 Apr; 46(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 8762237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Interpretation of an epidemiolog survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality]. Landais P; Jais JP Rev Prat; 1992 Nov; 42(18):2377-82. PubMed ID: 1296310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Causality in epidemiological research. Zieliński A Przegl Epidemiol; 2009; 63(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 20120956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How statistics can be used to promote better health care. Sinclair J Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 23-29; 95(25):44-6. PubMed ID: 10497591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimizing error in the field: quality control in dietary surveys. Haraldsdóttir J Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S19-24. PubMed ID: 8262013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports. Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. But is it significant? Cook RR Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Jul; 31(1):94-5. PubMed ID: 8357228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of low to moderate relative risks in environmental epidemiologic studies. Acquavella JF; Friedlander BR; Ireland BK Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():179-201. PubMed ID: 8054080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys. Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Key elements in the statistical analysis of surveys. Berchtold A Int J Public Health; 2007; 52(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 18704291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Causality in epidemiology: populations, individuals, and alternative explanations]. Botti C; Comba P; Pirastu R; Vineis P Epidemiol Prev; 1999; 23(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 10730466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality]. Touzet S; Colin C Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surveys: are they trustworthy? Pagano M Nutrition; 2004 Oct; 20(10):948. PubMed ID: 15474887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A primer in epidemiologic methodology. Weigler BJ Comp Med; 2001 Jun; 51(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 11924774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Social capital, from sociology to epidemiology: critical analysis of a transfer across disciplines]. Fassin D Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2003 Sep; 51(4):403-13. PubMed ID: 13679733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypotheses, tests, methods, and innovation: the balancing act in research. Berg AT Epilepsia; 2007 Dec; 48(12):2204-16. PubMed ID: 17868050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) - basic concepts and application of an approach for causal analyses in epidemiology]. Hardt J; Brendler C; Greiser KH; Timmer A; Seidler A; Weikert C; Latza U Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):878-9. PubMed ID: 22193895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]