242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762359)
1. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening in Italy: 2004 survey and 2005 preliminary data.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):7-20. PubMed ID: 17824359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69.
Hendry PJ; Entwistle C
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):88-9. PubMed ID: 8849767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The effectiveness of population-based breast cancer screening programme].
Szynglarewicz B; Matkowski R; Kasprzak P; Kotowska J; Forgacz J; Pudełko M; Kornafel J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Feb; 26(152):117-20. PubMed ID: 19388515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child.
Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H
Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in The Netherlands.
van Dijck JA; Holland R; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Jun; 86(12):934-8. PubMed ID: 8196083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening.
Hayes C; O'Herlihy B; Hynes M; Johnson Z
Ir J Med Sci; 1999; 168(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 10098340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeated mammographic screening reduces breast cancer mortality along the continuum of age.
Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL; Straatman H; Peer PG; Jong PC; Beex LV; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 12518006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.
Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
