241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762359)
21. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice.
O'Connor AM; Griffiths CJ; Underwood MR; Eldridge S
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9575461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammography screening in Italy: 2003-2004 survey.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Puliti D; Piccini P; Eugenio P
Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):7-16. PubMed ID: 16937842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer in Norway: comparative analysis of cancer registry data.
Suhrke P; Mæhlen J; Schlichting E; Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC; Zahl PH
BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d4692. PubMed ID: 21914765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme.
Olsson S; Andersson I; Karlberg I; Bjurstam N; Frodis E; Håkansson S
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.
Zahl PH; Maehlen J; Welch HG
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 168(21):2311-6. PubMed ID: 19029493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lower attendance rates in immigrant versus non-immigrant women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
Bhargava S; Tsuruda K; Moen K; Bukholm I; Hofvind S
J Med Screen; 2018 Sep; 25(3):155-161. PubMed ID: 29059006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three wave prospective study in England.
Sutton S; Saidi G; Bickler G; Hunter J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Aug; 49(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 7650466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mammography screening in Italy: 2005 survey and 2006 preliminary data.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(2 Suppl 1):7-22. PubMed ID: 18770992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Service screening with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer.
Jonsson H; Nyström L; Törnberg S; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 11678556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Profile of women not attending in the Swiss Mammography Screening Pilot Programme.
Bulliard JL; de Landtsheer JP; Levi F
Breast; 2004 Aug; 13(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 15325662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.
Thurfjell EL; Lindgren JA
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8888234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme.
Elwood M; McNoe B; Smith T; Bandaranayake M; Doyle TC
N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1066):180-3. PubMed ID: 9640316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.
Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; van Bon MJ
Int J Cancer; 1989 Feb; 43(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 2917799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effective biennial mammographic screening in women aged 40-49.
van Schoor G; Moss SM; Otten JD; Donders R; Paap E; den Heeten GJ; Holland R; Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3137-40. PubMed ID: 21036034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammographic screening.
Dorsch MM; Cheok F; Ingham HM
Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):623-5. PubMed ID: 1943962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Mammography breast cancer screening in Italy: 2010 survey].
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(6 Suppl 1):8-27. PubMed ID: 23293268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Integrating self-referral for mammography into organised screening: results from an Italian experience.
Bucchi L; Falcini F; Baraldi GP; Bondi A; Bonsanto R; Bravetti P; Desiderio F; de Bianchi PS
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 14561265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
