These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762502)

  • 1. [Vibratory acoustic stimulation test in fetal hearing monitor].
    Ke X; Gu Z; Wu R
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1995; 30(5):264-6. PubMed ID: 8762502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of the effects of vibro-acoustic stimulation test on the fetus during labor under epidural analgesia and evidence of its safety by way of auditory brainstem response].
    Morikawa S; Ishikawa J; Matsubara H; Nagata F; Nomura Y; Kamatsuki H; Shinzato Y; Yamaguchi Y; Niwa K; Kanakura Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 8133135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
    Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
    Chen BJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 26(2):71-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1860368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Auditory reactions in the newborn infant and fetus].
    Calvet J; Coll J; Laredo C; Camillieri L
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1972; 24(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 4670049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [ABR short latency negative responses in neonates].
    Zagólski O
    Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16053214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial audiologic assessment of infants referred from well baby, special care, and neonatal intensive care unit nurseries.
    Karzon RK; Lieu JE
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16803788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal magnetoencephalography--a multimodal approach.
    Eswaran H; Lowery CL; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H
    Brain Res Dev Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 154(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15617755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
    Xu ZM; Li J; Hu TZ; Sun JH; Shen XM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of fetal well-being by vibro-acoustic stimulation test].
    Sun DW; Chen XX; Gai MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Jun; 29(6):322-4, 380. PubMed ID: 8001402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss. Use of oto-acoustic emission tests in newborn infants with increased risk of hearing impairment].
    Størdal K; Anderssen SH; Lunde JT; Andersen R; Sponheim L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Oct; 118(26):4076-8. PubMed ID: 9844511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of vibratory acoustic stimulation on the duration of fetal heart rate monitoring tests.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Roberman BD
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Jul; 7(3):232-4. PubMed ID: 2372330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
    Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Attias J; Nageris B; Ralph J; Vajda J; Rappaport ZH
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):178-84. PubMed ID: 18389413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal acoustic stimulation in early labor and pathological fetal acidemia: a preliminary report.
    Chauhan SP; Hendrix NW; Devoe LD; Scardo JA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(5):208-12. PubMed ID: 10475502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.