These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762764)

  • 1. Can random-dot stereograms serve as a model for the perception of depth in relation to real three-dimensional objects?
    Bishop PO
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(10):1473-7. PubMed ID: 8762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Depth perception in random dot stereograms is not affected by changes in either vergence or accommodation.
    Gonzalez F; Rivadulla C; Perez R; Cadarso C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):743-7. PubMed ID: 9798214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disparity-evoked vergence is driven by interocular correlation.
    Mallot HA; Roll A; Arndt PA
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(18):2925-37. PubMed ID: 8917794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computation of Object Size in Visual Cortical Area V4 as a Neural Basis for Size Constancy.
    Tanaka S; Fujita I
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(34):12033-46. PubMed ID: 26311782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 4060612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of stereopsis in random-dot stereograms.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 Jan; 9(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 1738046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy.
    Scarfe P; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of surface reconstruction from binocular disparity based on standard regularization theory: comparison between "membrane" and "thin-plate" potential energy models.
    Shiraiwa A; Hayashi T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 21987913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single image random dot stereogram: principles and clinical implications.
    Lee DY; Ireland D
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Apr; 67(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8888831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in neural complexity during the perception of 3D images using random dot stereograms.
    Burgess AP; Rehman J; Williams JD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Apr; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 12694899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task.
    Glennerster A; Rogers BJ; Bradshaw MF
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3441-56. PubMed ID: 8977011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A physiological theory of depth perception from vertical disparity.
    Matthews N; Meng X; Xu P; Qian N
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 12505608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(11):1689-700. PubMed ID: 3832593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.