These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8762764)

  • 21. Organisation of signals involved in binocular perception and vergence control.
    Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2001; 41(25-26):3497-503. PubMed ID: 11718790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual fading without retinal adaptation.
    Hsieh PJ; Colas JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 22250867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
    Zhaoping L
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Constraints on human stereo dot matching.
    Harris JM; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2761-72. PubMed ID: 7975312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues.
    Bradshaw MF; Glennerster A; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 8711905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual mechanisms governing the perception of auto-stereograms.
    Gómez AT; Lupón N; Cardona G; Aznar-Casanova JA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Mar; 95(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 22023025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.
    Johnston EB
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(7-8):1351-60. PubMed ID: 1891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Masson GS; Busettini C; Miles FA
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):283-6. PubMed ID: 9305842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(28):3823-7. PubMed ID: 11090674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The area of spatial integration for initial horizontal disparity vergence.
    Popple AV; Smallman HS; Findlay JM
    Vision Res; 1998 Jan; 38(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 9536357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms.
    Aoki SC; Shiozaki HM; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):17. PubMed ID: 29071354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disparity in Context: Understanding how monocular image content interacts with disparity processing in human visual cortex.
    Duan Y; Thatte J; Yaklovleva A; Norcia AM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118139. PubMed ID: 33964460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transformation of the visual-line value in binocular vision: stimuli on corresponding points can be seen in two different directions.
    Ono H; Shimono K; Saida S; Ujike H
    Perception; 2000; 29(4):421-36. PubMed ID: 10953762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
    Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
    Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fusional limits for a large random-dot stereogram.
    Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(2):345-53. PubMed ID: 3414022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1.
    Trotter Y; Celebrini S; Stricanne B; Thorpe S; Imbert M
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 76(5):2872-85. PubMed ID: 8930240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stereo transparency in ambiguous stereograms generated by overlapping two identical dot patterns.
    Watanabe O
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):24.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.