These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8763217)

  • 1. Medical patients assessment protocol: a tool for evaluating the appropriateness of utilizing hospital-stay days for acute medical patients; development, reliability and applications.
    Mozes B; Rosenblum Y; Rom L; Friedman N; Shabtai E; Porat A
    Am J Med Qual; 1996; 11(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 8763217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liability and validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in Turkey.
    Kaya S; Vural G; Eroğlu K; Sain G; Mersin H; Karabeyoğlu M; Sezer K; Türkkani B; Restuccia JD
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Aug; 12(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 10985271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appropriateness of acute medical admissions and length of stay.
    Smith HE; Pryce A; Carlisle L; Jones JM; Scarpello J; Pantin C
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1997; 31(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 9429190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection and classification of inappropriate hospital stay.
    Butler JS; Barrett BJ; Kent G; Haire R; Parfrey PS
    Clin Invest Med; 1996 Aug; 19(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 8853573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability study of the European appropriateness evaluation protocol.
    Lorenzo S; Lang T; Pastor R; Tampieri A; Santos-Eggimann B; Smith H; Liberati A; Restuccia J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Oct; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 10561034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appropriateness of admissions and hospitalization days in an acute-care teaching hospital.
    Baré ML; Prat A; Lledo L; Asenjo MA; Salleras L
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1995; 43(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 7667539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability and validity of the French version of the first part of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEPf): pertinent criteria of hospitalization stay].
    Robain M; Lang T; Fontaine A; Logerot H; Monnet E; Six P; Huet B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 10367301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the necessity of hospital stay by means of the appropriateness evaluation protocol: how strong is the evidence to proceed?
    Smeets PM; Verheggen FW; Pop P; Panis LJ; Carpay JJ
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Dec; 12(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 11202602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital care in internal medicine. Reliability of a German adaptation of the procedure].
    Schneeweiss S; Sangha O; Siebert H; Hebeisen H; Hübner M; Heinrich R; Wildner M; Witte J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jul; 125(30):894-9. PubMed ID: 10962971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bed utilization: a regional trial.
    O'Neill ML
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1993; 2(5):35-9. PubMed ID: 10129550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appropriate hospital stay: a Dutch report.
    Panis LJ; Verheggen FW; Pop P
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Feb; 14(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 11873763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reproducibility of a German scale for assessing the need for inpatient treatment in surgery].
    Schneeweiss S; Sangha O; Siebert H; Hübner M; Fuhrmann J; Wildner M; Witte J
    Soz Praventivmed; 2000; 45(6):258-66. PubMed ID: 11210596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol.
    Liu W; Yuan S; Wei F; Yang J; Zhang Z; Zhu C; Ma J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136498. PubMed ID: 26305363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Appropriateness evaluation of short hospital admissions using Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (Italian version): experience of a teaching hospital].
    Capalbo G; D'Andrea G; Volpe M; Cambieri A; Cicchetti A; Ricciardi G
    Ann Ig; 2004; 16(6):759-65. PubMed ID: 15697006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.
    Strumwasser I; Paranjpe NV; Ronis DL; Share D; Sell LJ
    Med Care; 1990 Feb; 28(2):95-111. PubMed ID: 2299897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining the appropriate use of community hospital beds.
    Donald IP; Jay T; Linsell J; Foy C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Feb; 51(463):95-100. PubMed ID: 11217640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experience with the use of criteria for evaluating the need for hospitalization in a surgery department].
    Hrobon P; Schwarz J; Smutný S; Wald M
    Rozhl Chir; 1998 Sep; 77(9):408-13. PubMed ID: 9828650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?
    Kalant N; Berlinguet M; Diodati JG; Dragatakis L; Marcotte F
    CMAJ; 2000 Jun; 162(13):1809-13. PubMed ID: 10906913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with inappropriate hospitalization in medical wards: a cross-sectional study in two university hospitals.
    Paldi Y; Porath A; Friedman L; Mozes B
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1995 Sep; 7(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 8595464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hospital appropriateness evaluation protocol in elderly patients: a technique to evaluate admission and hospital stay.
    Sánchez-García S; Juárez-Cedillo T; Mould-Quevedo JF; García-González JJ; Contreras-Hernández I; Espinel-Bermudez MC; Hernández-Hernández DM; Garduño-Espinosa J; García-Peña C
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2008 Jun; 22(2):306-13. PubMed ID: 18489701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.