These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 87649)

  • 21. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears--implications for the UK cervical cancer screening programme.
    Baker RW; O'Sullivan JP; Hanley J; Coleman DV
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 May; 52(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 10560356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [False negative reactions of cervical cytological examinations and defective follow-up after demonstration of abnormal cervical cytological findings].
    Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Dec; 149(52):3571-4. PubMed ID: 3433574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pitfalls in diagnostic cervicovaginal cytology.
    Sidawy MK; Solomon D
    Monogr Pathol; 1997; (39):1-15. PubMed ID: 9249817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
    Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CYTYC Corporation.
    Zahniser DJ; Sullivan PJ
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8604572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A normal vaginal smear and still cervical cancer].
    Bosch MM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Mar; 137(10):517-8. PubMed ID: 8455745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Cervical neoplasms. A study of conditions influencing the occurrence of false negative tests].
    Eide TJ; Engh V; Hansen L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 May; 107(14):1204-6, 1211. PubMed ID: 3603478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology.
    Gray JA
    BMJ; 1990 Jul; 301(6744):183. PubMed ID: 2390615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pseudo-decidual reaction to Mirena coil in a cervical smear: a potential diagnostic pitfall for false-positive cervical cytology.
    Hughes C; Woods J; Turner L; Gibbons D
    Cytopathology; 2005 Oct; 16(5):268-9. PubMed ID: 16181320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical analysis of data in cervical cytology from the viewpoint of total quality management.
    Kaminsky FC; Burke RJ; Haberle KR; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 7887069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Roche Image Analysis Systems, Inc.
    Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 8604576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A normal vaginal smear and still cervical cancer].
    van Leeuwen WG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Mar; 137(10):518. PubMed ID: 8455746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gynaecological cytopathology and the search for perfection: civil liability and regulatory ramifications.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2003 Nov; 11(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 14655583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
    Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.