These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8765242)

  • 21. Resident Operative Vaginal Delivery Volume after Educational Curriculum Implementation.
    Becker DA; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Rogers SL; Brumfield CG; Subramaniam A
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Nov; 37(13):1296-1300. PubMed ID: 32455468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Fetal expulsion: Which interventions for perineal prevention? CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].
    Riethmuller D; Ramanah R; Mottet N
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):937-947. PubMed ID: 30377094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Design of a new instrumented forceps: application to safe obstetrical forceps blade placement.
    Moreau R; Pham MT; Silveira R; Redarce T; Brun X; Dupuis O
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1280-90. PubMed ID: 17605359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy--a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
    Macleod M; Murphy DJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Feb; 136(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 17459568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The use of forceps delivery in own analysis].
    Neuberg M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 10860255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Operative vaginal delivery: a review of four national guidelines.
    Tsakiridis I; Giouleka S; Mamopoulos A; Athanasiadis A; Daniilidis A; Dagklis T
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):189-198. PubMed ID: 31926101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Instrument placement is sub-optimal in three of ten attempted operative vaginal deliveries.
    Rouse DJ
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):564. PubMed ID: 25471237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survey of obstetric forceps training in North America in 1981.
    Healy DL; Laufe LE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 151(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 3966505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating obstetrical residency programs using patient outcomes.
    Asch DA; Nicholson S; Srinivas S; Herrin J; Epstein AJ
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 19773562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Obstetric operation, instrumental delivery and 3rd degree perineal tear and anal incontinence].
    Kalis V; Stĕpán J; Turek J; Chaloupka P; Rokyta Z
    Ceska Gynekol; 2005 Nov; 70(6):411-8. PubMed ID: 17955791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].
    Thubert T; Cardaillac C; Fritel X; Winer N; Dochez V
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 30385355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The art of performing a safe forceps delivery: a skill to revitalise.
    Rather H; Muglu J; Veluthar L; Sivanesan K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():49-54. PubMed ID: 26897398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The dual influences of age and obstetric history on fecal continence in parous women.
    Eogan M; O'Brien C; Daly L; Behan M; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Feb; 112(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 21078512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison vacuum extractor versus forceps].
    Schaal JP; Equy V; Hoffman P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S231-43. PubMed ID: 19268200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Instrumental vaginal deliveries; are midwives safer practitioners? A retrospective cohort study.
    Black M; Mitchell E; Danielian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Dec; 92(12):1383-7. PubMed ID: 24111562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Operative delivery data in France for 2007: results of a national survey within teaching hospitals].
    Mangin M; Ramanah R; Aouar Z; Courtois L; Collin A; Cossa S; Martin A; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Apr; 39(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 20153125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings.
    Bahl R; Murphy DJ; Strachan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 20362383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.