225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8765244)
1. Resolving the clinical and ethical dilemma involved in fetal-maternal conflicts.
Pinkerton JV; Finnerty JJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 8765244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnant woman vs. fetus: a dilemma for hospital ethics committees.
Swartz M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 1342849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 2309810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Court-ordered obstetrical intervention and the rights of a pregnant woman.
Thampapillai D
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 15957588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
Rossiter GP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Court-ordered treatment in obstetrics: the ethical views and legal framework.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 79(3):476-7; author reply 478-9. PubMed ID: 1738534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict.
Nelson LJ; Milliken N
JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 3276942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Scott C
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.
Doukas DJ; Elkins TE
Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current controversies in obstetrics: wrongful life and forced fetal surgical procedures.
Engelhardt HT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 151(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 3970098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
Levine EM
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical principles: application to an obstetric case.
Bushy A; Rauh JR; Matt BF
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1989; 18(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 2661765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Sep; 66(3):442-6. PubMed ID: 4022506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal/fetal rights: two views.
Justin RG; Rosner F
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1989; 44(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 2723319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The maternal-fetal dyad. Exploring the two-patient obstetric model.
Mattingly SS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1544794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal-fetal conflicts. Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives.
King NM
J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 1757822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
Leavine BA
Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
Paris JJ
Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesareans and Samaritans.
Rhoden NK
Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 3695574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
Noble-Allgire AM
J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
