73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8766310)
21. [Reduced mortality with mammographic screening. The natural course, too rough methods resulted in miscalculation on breast cancer].
Rutqvist LE
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(10):1210-1. PubMed ID: 10193130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
Bick U
Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammographic screening in Italy.
Franceschi S; Geddes M
Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8779):1402-3. PubMed ID: 1682768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Mammographic screening: results and perspectives].
Rosselli del Turco M
Radiol Med; 1991 Mar; 81(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 2014344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark, 1990-1991].
Andreasen AH; Andersen KW; Madsen M; Mouridsen HT; Olesen KP; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Oct; 156(44):6517-20. PubMed ID: 7825250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Mammographic examinations in Denmark in 1984].
Pociot F; Storm HH; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 1986 Feb; 148(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 3961991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Current statistics by the SBU are not up to date].
Tabár L
Lakartidningen; 1995 Nov; 92(48):4540-1. PubMed ID: 7490966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Breast neoplasms in Italy and Sicily].
Crocetti E; Buzzoni C; Puliti D
Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(1-2 Suppl 1):87-94. PubMed ID: 19621568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Schematization and forcing of the analysis of mammographic screening effectiveness].
Liberati A
Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 26(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 12125384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Callback rate after screening mammography.
Linver MN; Rosenberg RD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):262-3. PubMed ID: 9648803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast-screening brawl.
Kopans DB
Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5307):1721-4. PubMed ID: 9122674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Routine mammography screening increases except among minorities and the elderly.
Oncology (Williston Park); 2002 Jan; 16(1):63, 123. PubMed ID: 11831611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Significance of roentgen mammography for breast carcinoma screening].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Krämer S; Döinghaus K; Säbel M; Lang N; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 1997 May; 50(5):103-9. PubMed ID: 9297252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast-screening brawl.
Sowinski J
Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5307):1721. PubMed ID: 9122673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. NHS performance tables for breast screening.
Shah S; Roche T; Henderson G
Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):529. PubMed ID: 9482484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Canada Health Monitor results concerning screening mammography.
Berger E
CMAJ; 1996 Sep; 155(6):633-4. PubMed ID: 8823208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammographic screening from age 40 years.
Gøtzsche PC
Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9563):737-738. PubMed ID: 17336640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammography studies revisited.
Emory TH
Minn Med; 2004 Feb; 87(2):7. PubMed ID: 15005121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographic screening: no longer controversial.
Cady B; Chung M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2005 Feb; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15685026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
