These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8767008)

  • 1. Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
    Hantschke D
    Mycoses; 1996; 39(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8767008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.
    Campbell CK; Davey KG; Holmes AD; Szekely A; Warnock DW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):821-3. PubMed ID: 9986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of the RapID Yeast Plus System and the API 20C AUX Clinical Yeast System.
    Smith MB; Dunklee D; Vu H; Woods GL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 37(8):2697-8. PubMed ID: 10405424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the identification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Gündeş SG; Gulenc S; Bingol R
    J Med Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 50(12):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 11761197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple strategy for direct identification of medically important yeast species from positive blood culture vials.
    Sheppard DC; René P; Harris AD; Miller MA; Laverdière M; deSouza E; Robson HG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2040-1. PubMed ID: 10325374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of four commercialized biochemical systems for clinical yeast identification by colour-producing reactions.
    Paugam A; Benchetrit M; Fiacre A; Tourte-Schaefer C; Dupouy-Camet J
    Med Mycol; 1999 Feb; 37(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10200929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Buchaille L; Freydière AM; Guinet R; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):479-88. PubMed ID: 9764550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Auxacolor with API 20 C Aux in yeast identification.
    Willemsen M; Breynaert J; Lauwers S
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 1997 Jun; 3(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 11864135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Schuffenecker I; Freydière A; de Montclos H; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Apr; 12(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 8513813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
    Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Agents of otomycosis in Manisa region, Turkey, 1995-2011].
    Değerli K; Ecemiş T; Günhan K; Başkesen T; Kal E
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2012 Jan; 46(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 22399174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Morphological and biochemical features of fungi isolated from patients with renal failure].
    Drozdowska A
    Wiad Parazytol; 2007; 53(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 17912812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.