These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8767255)

  • 1. Hearing aids: statistical study and satisfaction survey of patients in an ENT practice.
    Robillard T; Gillain M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1996; 50(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8767255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic modeling in medical technology assessment. Fitting hearing aids in The Netherlands.
    Boas G; van der Stel H; Peters H; Joore M; Anteunis L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):618-25. PubMed ID: 11758306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
    de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Hearing in a geriatric perspective].
    Boisen G; Lindemann L; Lange K; Horwitz N; Parving A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Oct; 159(43):6362-6. PubMed ID: 9411959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.
    Badran K; Bunstone D; Arya AK; Suryanarayanan R; Mackinnon N
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 16868513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral amplification for the elderly: are two aids better than one?
    Holmes AE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S63-7. PubMed ID: 12918631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What every otolaryngologist should know about hearing aids.
    Schiff M; Cohen IJ
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Jun; 88(6):932-45. PubMed ID: 651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Candidacy for bilateral hearing aids: a retrospective multicenter study.
    Boymans M; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Festen JM; Dreschler WA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 18664691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids.
    Hill SL; Marcus A; Digges EN; Gillman N; Silverstein H
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Jul; 85(7):427-30, 442. PubMed ID: 16909811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users.
    Davis A
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S39-52. PubMed ID: 12918628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient preferences for direct hearing aid provision by a private dispenser. A discrete choice experiment.
    Grutters JP; Joore MA; Kessels AG; Davis AC; Anteunis LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 18469716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services.
    Gatehouse S
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1999 Nov; 57(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 12811876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experiments with hearing aids with amplitude compression.
    Nielsen HB
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):293-314. PubMed ID: 292145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "hearing aid effect" 2005: a rigorous test of the visibility of new hearing aid styles.
    Johnson CE; Danhauer JL; Gavin RB; Karns SR; Reith AC; Lopez IP
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16489875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Success and failure factors for hearing-aid prescription: results of a French national survey.
    Abdellaoui A; Tran Ba Huy P
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2013 Dec; 130(6):313-9. PubMed ID: 23725663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing aid possession in the population: lessons from a small country.
    Stephens D; Lewis P; Davis A; Gianopoulos I; Vetter N
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 11409762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.