These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Limitations in the interpretation of biopsies in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. Velazquez EF; Barreto JE; Rodriguez I; Piris A; Cubilla AL Int J Surg Pathol; 2004 Apr; 12(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15173919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histologic grade and perineural invasion are more important than tumor thickness as predictor of nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma invading 5 to 10 mm. Velazquez EF; Ayala G; Liu H; Chaux A; Zanotti M; Torres J; Cho SI; Barreto JE; Soares F; Cubilla AL Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Jul; 32(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 18460979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Papillary squamous cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) of the penis: clinicopathologic features, differential diagnosis, and outcome of 35 cases. Chaux A; Soares F; Rodríguez I; Barreto J; Lezcano C; Torres J; Velazquez EF; Cubilla AL Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Feb; 34(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 20061934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prognostic index: a useful pathologic guide for prediction of nodal metastases and survival in penile squamous cell carcinoma. Chaux A; Caballero C; Soares F; Guimarães GC; Cunha IW; Reuter V; Barreto J; Rodríguez I; Cubilla AL Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1049-57. PubMed ID: 19384188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pseudoglandular (adenoid, acantholytic) penile squamous cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and outcome study of 7 patients. Cunha IW; Guimaraes GC; Soares F; Velazquez E; Torres JJ; Chaux A; Ayala G; Cubilla AL Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):551-5. PubMed ID: 19033863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Squamous carcinoma of the penis with a rhabdoid phenotype]. Urdiales Viedma M; Fernández Rodríguez A; Romero Díaz JA; Madrid Gutiérrez M Arch Esp Urol; 2003 May; 56(4):425-7. PubMed ID: 12830616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis with rhabdoid features. Urdiales-Viedma M; Fernandez-Rodriguez A; De Haro-Muñoz T; Pichardo-Pichardo S Ann Diagn Pathol; 2002 Dec; 6(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 12478490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting cancer progression in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of depth of invasion and vascular invasion. Emerson RE; Ulbright TM; Eble JN; Geary WA; Eckert GJ; Cheng L Mod Pathol; 2001 Oct; 14(10):963-8. PubMed ID: 11598165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data. Ficarra V; Zattoni F; Cunico SC; Galetti TP; Luciani L; Fandella A; Guazzieri S; Maruzzi D; Sava T; Siracusano S; Pilloni S; Tasca A; Martignoni G; Gardiman M; Tardanico R; Zambolin T; Cisternino A; Artibani W; Cancer; 2005 Jun; 103(12):2507-16. PubMed ID: 15856474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area. Mannweiler S; Sygulla S; Tsybrovskyy O; Razmara Y; Pummer K; Regauer S Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1378-85. PubMed ID: 22421354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological factors, behavior, and histological prognostic risk groups in subtypes of penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Sanchez DF; Soares F; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Cañete S; Fernández-Nestosa MJ; Rodríguez IM; Barreto J; Cubilla AL Semin Diagn Pathol; 2015 May; 32(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 25677263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological features of epithelial abnormalities and precancerous lesions of the penis. Cubilla AL; Meijer CJ; Young RH Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2000; (205):215-9. PubMed ID: 11144900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of morphologic features and outcome of resected recurrent and nonrecurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a study of 81 cases. Chaux A; Reuter V; Lezcano C; Velazquez EF; Torres J; Cubilla AL Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Sep; 33(9):1299-306. PubMed ID: 19471153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: predicting nodal metastases by histologic grade, pattern of invasion and clinical examination. Alkatout I; Naumann CM; Hedderich J; Hegele A; Bolenz C; Jünemann KP; Klöppel G Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 20060332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of pathologic prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Cubilla AL World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 18766352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cutaneous horn of the penis]. de la Peña Zarzuelo E; Carro Rubias C; Sierra E; Delgado JA; Silmi Moyano A; Resel Estévez L Arch Esp Urol; 2001 May; 54(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 11455772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variation in grading and staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in relation to the clinical outcome. Naumann CM; Alkatout I; Hamann MF; Al-Najar A; Hegele A; Korda JB; Bolenz C; Klöppel G; Jünemann KP; van der Horst C BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1660-5. PubMed ID: 19220243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Not all penile cancers are created equal. Choi K; Hale N; Olsen D; Deem S Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):8003-5. PubMed ID: 26432973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]