These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 876794)

  • 1. Analysis of processing demands in partial report.
    Matthew JS; Antes JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):847-56. PubMed ID: 876794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: a dual-task approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):695-725. PubMed ID: 11548031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound affects the speed of visual processing.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modality-dependent "what" and "where" preparatory processes in auditory and visual systems.
    Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20350168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resource for temporal information processing in interval production.
    Shinohara K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):917-28. PubMed ID: 10407900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
    Wilson DE; Muroi M; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):319-35. PubMed ID: 21299322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children.
    Rattat AC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010; 106(2-3):145-62. PubMed ID: 20211473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.
    Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there brief temporal buffering of successive visual inputs?
    Smith WS; Mollon JD; Bhardwaj R; Smithson HE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):767-91. PubMed ID: 21462092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.