These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 876794)

  • 21. Attention demands of spatially locating position of a ball in flight.
    Starkes JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Feb; 64(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 3562177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Brain activity during auditory and visual phonological, spatial and simple discrimination tasks.
    Salo E; Rinne T; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1496():55-69. PubMed ID: 23261663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sound increases the saliency of visual events.
    Noesselt T; Bergmann D; Hake M; Heinze HJ; Fendrich R
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():157-63. PubMed ID: 18234167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Information on location in visual persistence: effects of temporal delay and duration of exposure on report of dot location.
    Hanari T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Apr; 80(2):643-50. PubMed ID: 7675607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resource allocation and the attentional demands of letter encoding.
    Johnson PJ; Forester JA; Calderwood R; Weisgerber SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Dec; 112(4):616-38. PubMed ID: 6229598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return.
    Tassinari G; Campara D; Benedetti C; Berlucchi G
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12355281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Task demands determine RT retinal location function.
    Iwasaki S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 6877974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
    Van der Burg E; Olivers CN; Bronkhorst AW; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1053-65. PubMed ID: 18823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease.
    Akamatsu T; Fukuyama H; Kawamata T
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Jun; 269(1-2):118-25. PubMed ID: 18279895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.