These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8768473)

  • 41. [A new syllable text for evaluating near vision].
    Kolling GH; Höltzcke P
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Feb; 92(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 7719078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K; Stigmar G; Hall-Lindberg J
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children.
    McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Oct; 13(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 8278195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.
    Lueder GT; Garibaldi D
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4333-9. PubMed ID: 15557440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Variability of vision].
    Peregrin J; Hejcmanová D; Hartmann M; Svĕrák J
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1994 Feb; 50(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 8137433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measurement of visual acuity with logarithmic charts: comparison between methods of threshold estimation.
    Sakuma JT; da Silva JA; Velasco e Cruz AA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Aug; 68(8):666-9. PubMed ID: 1923345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Letter legibility and the construction of a new visual acuity chart.
    Hedin A; Olsson K
    Ophthalmologica; 1984; 189(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 6493696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test.
    Bailey IL; Jackson AJ; Minto H; Greer RB; Chu MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1257-64. PubMed ID: 22842307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.
    Sailoganathan A; Osuobeni EP; Siderov J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 29676304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Habitual vs optimal distance visual acuity.
    Pointer JS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 18761483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The determination of the central static visual acuity, presentation of a modified Landolt C chart.
    Jonkers GH; Burger J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1991; 78(3-4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1790744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Vanishing optotypes. New type of acuity test letters.
    Frisén L
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1194-8. PubMed ID: 3741251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acuity measurements in adult subjects using a preferential looking test.
    Woodhouse JM; Morjaria SA; Adler PM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17239190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Test charts for distance preferred for low-vision.
    Fonda G
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1987 May; 19(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 3592477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contour interaction in the preschool child.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interocular differences in visual function in normal subjects.
    Wood JM; Bullimore MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 8944198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.