These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8768666)
1. Equivalent diameter of standard quartz dust used as a test aerosol for the dust respirator. Myojo T; Sugimoto M Ind Health; 1996; 34(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 8768666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of challenge aerosols for performance test for dust respirators. Myojo T; Sugimoto M Ind Health; 1997 Oct; 35(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 9348722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride. Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of total inward leakage measured using sodium chloride (NaCl) and corn oil aerosol methods for air-purifying respirators. Rengasamy S; Zhuang Z; Niezgoda G; Walbert G; Lawrence R; Boutin B; Hudnall J; Monaghan WP; Bergman M; Miller C; Harris J; Coffey C J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Aug; 15(8):616-627. PubMed ID: 29781773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of single-use masks and respirators for protection of health care workers against mycobacterial aerosols. Chen SK; Vesley D; Brosseau LM; Vincent JH Am J Infect Control; 1994 Apr; 22(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 8060007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods. Rengasamy S; Eimer BC J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods. Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Worst-case" aerosol testing parameters: III. Initial penetration of charged and neutralized lead fume and silica dust aerosols through clean, unloaded respirator filters. Moyer ES; Stevens GA Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 2543198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Penetration of airborne microorganisms through a surgical mask and a dust/mist respirator. Willeke K; Qian Y; Donnelly J; Grinshpun S; Ulevicius V Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Apr; 57(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 8901236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Rengasamy S; Eimer BC Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators. Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece. Chen CC; Ruuskanen J; Pilacinski W; Willeke K Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):632-9. PubMed ID: 2270830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for measuring the spatial variability of aerosol penetration through respirator filters. Huang C; Willeke K; Qian Y; Grinshpun S; Ulevicius V Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jul; 59(7):461-5. PubMed ID: 9697293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of particle charge on the performance of a filtering facepiece. Chen CC; Huang SH Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Apr; 59(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 9586197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations. Li L; Zuo Z; Japuntich DA; Pui DY Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 22752097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental. Hinds WC; Kraske G Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):836-41. PubMed ID: 3687728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters. Rengasamy S; BerryAnn R; Szalajda J J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):519-25. PubMed ID: 23927008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate. Stevens GA; Moyer ES Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 2729101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Powered, air-purifying particulate respirator filter penetration by a DOP aerosol. Martin S; Moyer E; Jensen P J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Nov; 3(11):620-30. PubMed ID: 17086666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]