These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8770475)

  • 1. Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: interlaboratory variability.
    Beauman GJ; Reiber JH; Koning G; Vogel RA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 8770475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inaccuracy of quantitative coronary arteriography when analyzed from S-VHS videotape.
    Reiber JH; Koning G; van der Zwet PM; Schiemanck L
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 8770476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?
    Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Seppenwoolde Y; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Oct; 68(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 16969851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of quantitative measurements in coronary arteries by multi-slice computed tomography: experimental and initial clinical results.
    Schroeder S; Kopp AF; Ohnesorge B; Flohr T; Baumbach A; Kuettner A; Herdeg C; Karsch KR; Claussen CD
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jun; 56(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 11428796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography.
    Tsuchida K; van der Giessen WJ; Patterson M; Tanimoto S; García-García HM; Regar E; Ligthart JM; Maugenest AM; Maatrijk G; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2007 May; 3(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 19737692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.
    Sirnes PA; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Golf S
    Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8915721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of 4 French catheters for quantitative coronary analysis: in vivo variability assessment using 6 French guiding catheters as reference scaling devices.
    Sanmartin M; Goicolea J; Castellanos R; Bravo M; Ocaranza R; Cuevas D; Mantilla R; Ruiz-Salmeron R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15152158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS.
    Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is quantitative angiography sufficient to guide stent implantation? A comparison with three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images.
    Prati F; Gil R; Di Mario C; Ozaki Y; Bruining N; Camenzind E; de Feyter PJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 27(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 9199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Ramcharitar S; Daeman J; Patterson M; van Guens RJ; Boersma E; Serruys PW; van der Giessen WJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18098181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional vessel analyses provide more accurate length estimations than the gold standard QCA.
    Meerkin D; Marom H; Cohen-Biton O; Einav S
    J Interv Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 23(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 20236215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.
    Klein JL; Boccuzzi SJ; Treasure CB; Manoukian SV; Vogel RA; Beauman GJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Weintaub WS
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(10):815-22. PubMed ID: 8623732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Pantos I; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis DG
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 19573720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis.
    Moer R; van Weert AW; Myreng Y; Mølstad P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Dec; 19(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 14690184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variations in measured vessel diameters using coronary measurement system.
    Robert N; Yaffe MJ; Langer A
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 8922311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Permanent Electronic Storage of Angiographic Images in the Catheterization Laboratory: High-Resolution and Real-Time Acquisition on Optical Laserdiscs.
    Azancot I; Krone RJ; Eiferman C; Guermonprez JL; Metzger JP; Le Dref O ; Steg G; Bonan R; Lesperance J; Hudon G; Friolo S; Beaufils P
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 9(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 10762881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography.
    Agostoni P; Biondi-Zoccai G; Van Langenhove G; Cornelis K; Vermeersch P; Convens C; Vassanelli C; Van Den Heuvel P; Van Den Branden F; Verheye S
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 102(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 18638585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.